78645354564789sdhhkkg
4642876863754ghkghk
78645354564789sdhhkkg

You could at least consider someone who hasn’t been shilling for the same plutocratic agenda we’ve been mired in for decades. If you disagree with a candidate’s policies, it won’t matter what you feel or think is right, when you tacitly endorse things you believe are wrong. Everyone wants to say that a progressive not

Wow, all these folks with strategies for third parties, meanwhile they’re telling everyone that a vote for anyone but Clinton is wasted (as if voting for whom you think most closely shares your values is only to selfishly spite others, not because you think it will help make things better for everyone).

I suspect an influx of paid shills in the comments sections over the next year, don’t you?

Right... who’s to say what either of us are doing. You don’t know how old I am. If you want a good example of what smugness looks like you should read your own posts. Which one of us is throwing the temper tantrum?

I could agree with your point of view if the assumption that Hillary Clinton is actually an alternative

I’m surprised to read someone who so lazily accepts the “inevitable” candidate handed to them by the powers-that-be sincerely lecture everyone who disagrees with them that they aren’t politically involved enough. All of your rhetorical questions reveal the completely absurd, baseless assumptions you’re making about

I hate this “viable” bullshit. You shouldn’t give your vote a candidate just because they’re the most likely to win.

Supporting LBGT causes, including marriage equality...

People should vote their conscience, not only to be on the winning team. A third-party candidate might actually be a legitimate choice for someone to give their vote to, not just a symbolic act. Maybe a vote for Clinton is in fact a vote for “them” and you don’t realize it.

It’s shocking how many people don’t know this. That Bush won by a decision from the Supreme Court, not because Ralph Nader stole Gore’s votes, as if they were his property and he was entitled to be elected.

Even supposedly enlightened, progressive Americans are deeply indoctrinated in the two-party political theater and are hopelessly oblivious of the fact that the two parties are different arms of the same oppressive machinery. The demographic groups to whom they pander are different, and so are the policy views,