71vette
SandZR2
71vette

Exactly the only reason to pick a shitty crossover over a minivan is styling. If you want something that drives like a car but can carry lots of stuff then what you really want is a wagon.

I would take that 911 over one of the cars above any day. The scooter could be fun too in the right area. Personally, I would just stick with the Porsche is it yours?

The commercial cant tell you anything interesting about the Outlander because its not interesting. Its just another boring crossover to sell to people that don't really care about driving. If someone wants a real SUV they should buy one of these.

Thats the one I would choose. That thing is sick!!!!

They seem to be worth on average about $4,000,000 each so the collection of 15 in the picture is worth $60,000,000. All 19 cars combined would be worth about $76,000,000. These are just estimates but each one of those cars is worth more money than you or I is ever likely to earn.

The cords are there to pull the seat belts out of the way during the driver change. I think it is probably a thin enough cord that the driver doesn't really notice it when he is shifting. That being said this is an amazing sounding car. I hope I will be able to go to Goodwood one day to see this in person.

Your right it was a 2005. I got confused thinking the 6.0L was 2006 only when its really 05 and 06.

Are you surprised they are all driven my middle age women. Who else would buy a vehicle that awful?

These are actually really good cars. My uncle had a 2006 GTO. It was yellow with a black interior and a manual transmission. That car was incredibly fun. I wish he still had it.

The new Civic can't be that bad. What I can believe is how many of these I see around.

A Mercedes-Mini couldn't be anywhere near as bad as the BMW 5-series GT could it? Can't these German companies stick with making quick, good looking cars instead of the monstrosities they insist on producing to expand into ever smaller niches.

I drive a low horsepower rear wheel drive car in California. It has no traction control or stability control nor any need for them. My car is a BMW 3 series and it weighs 2800 lbs while a new 3 series weighs nearly 400 lbs. This is what is meant when someone says new cars are too expensive and too heavy.

I personally prefer the sound of the six cylinder engines but your right a 91 318is would be cheaper and better driving than that 320i.

The BMW is absurdly overpriced. The car is basically and e30 318i except 10 times more expensive. Sure this is in better shape than most BMW's of this era but that's almost e30 M3 money. Ton answer the question I personally wouldn't buy either of these cars. I would stick with my 1984 325e that I bought for $800 in

I completely agree with you. I have wanted to see a Pagani in person for a long time. My dream was fulfilled last weekend at Sonoma raceway when I saw this. Needless to say the highlight of my day occurred before I watched a single race.

Chaparral 2J. The first true ground effects car. I think I win

Solution number two is quite simply a bad idea. It infringes on the privacy of the citizens in this scenario. The idea of the government having the gps position of my car at all time and charging me more for the farther I drive frightens me. Plus why do you want people to be charged for "unnecessary driving"? This is

Is there such thing as a bad quote from Kimi?

I know this isn't part of racing history but what about the four corner independent active areo from the Pagani Huayra. That contributed to it being the fastest street car ever around the Top Gear Test Track.

Ford should defiantly continue to sell the Falcon but expand it to other markets. I think it would be a much better Lincoln than any of the ones currently for sale. If the Falcon was sold as a Lincoln in the United States they could sell it at a profit and they would have Lincolns that are much closer competitors to