67alect0
Matt
67alect0

I respect that answer. My Mustang II drag car had a manual rack and a manual valve body C4 with a ratchet shifter, so even just moving it in and out of a parking spot on its rare street excursions meant planning ahead and thinking through it.

First choice?

I have to agree. Anyone that tells me this is a better car than the Mustang II is smoking something.

Selling every damned one of my old projects.

We when they said the CT was a go anywhere end of the world truck, they really meant go any where with it and it will be thee end of the world for the CT.

Top of the line in utility sports

Pennies? Luxury... I had to get up in the morning at ten o’clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad would have the train run over us, and dance about on our

Considering how often the Mustang II front suspension has been used over and over by hot rods, street rods, and kit cars; the car has more legacy in the car world than it gets credit for.

Were you going to post some pictures of the wrecked truck? I think those pics are from how they come from the factory.

(shrug) For me, it would have been a 5.0 Mustang. Simply because those things were SO damn tuneable, you could pull up to one at a light and have no idea if it were stock at 225 HP (keep in mind that back then, that was sufficient; even your JDM example in the article only made 200 HP), or did it have headers,

This thing screams bring a magnet when you go look at this thing.

They’re sharing the same part number—duh.

Pathetic earthlings. Hurling your bodies out into the void, without the slightest inkling of who or what is out here. If you had known anything about the true nature of the universe, anything at all, you would’ve hidden from it in terror.” -Ming the Merciless

I like it better when they meow when they pull you over

License and Registration CHICKEN FUCKER!!!!!! BAHHH-KAWWWKK!!

Just because this car is more expensive to maintain than a J.C. Whitney special like your Charger, doesn’t make it any less desirable. This Italian beauty is curvy and iconic, and much better looking than the vast majority of Ferraris today. Being cheap to maintain does not equate to an automatic “NP.”

I’d rather go to the Banana museum and get a monkey’s tail.