Let's face it, the 70's were pretty gay. Queen and The Village People fit right in.

Just like Putin with shirt off. Not gay at all.

Let's face it, the only reason why British comedians want Trump to win is that then America because the punchline to political jokes around the world, not Britain.

Angelina Jolie is single? No American male in their 20's is now safe.

He's a lot safer in Hanoi than in the US. If you read these comments from these wacos, you can see why. The same BS for 8 years. Enough, the war is over. Oh my gosh, look what they've become. LOL.

Yes, you're post is completely pretentious. She's 21, and she's making music that sounds like a 21 year old would make. Just like her last album, she had lyrics a teenager would make because she wrote them when she was a teenager. Yet, so idiots complained, just like you have here.

It's actually a pretty good album. You're post is more pretentious than this review, yet you wouldn't know that, would you?

Why would you go after kids with 10's of dollars as disposable income, when you you've got older viewers with 10's of thousands of disposable income? Jon Stewart was making 25 million a year for a reason. It's not the number of viewers, it's the right kind of viewers.

I got the first four right, but it was a complete toss up after that. Should I have expected anything different?

One of the funniest things I've seen on television this year. Even the dresses were perfect. The foam on the lip just made me lose it.

I thought that was so funny how they did that. One of the funniest things I've seen all year.

I thought this was a quality episode and best laughs since the amazing Twelve Angry Men. The coffee foam sketch was laugh out loud hilarious and one of the funniest things she's ever put on. I didn't realize she was so good at physical comedy. The princess sketch was good too. The rest of the episode was OK but…

i suspect this isn't the first time people have thought of you as a dbag.

Master, what planet do you live on? I hope they have lots of tin foil there.

What total BS. Cronkite was objective and certainly had strong opinions about the news. Heck, he even went after people and events as well. The difference is that he fully explained why and how he did it, so that even if you didn't agree with him, you at least understood why he was reporting like this and still…

Total BS. Cronkite was objective, and that's why he was trusted. He went after people too, but always fully explained why, and how he did it.

I hope you're being sarcastic, because if not, you have some serious, serious problems.

Literally.

Oh my. I haven't laughed that hard in a while. Well Played.