Based on this, I don’t believe you are old enough to actually know anything about this case.

See my last comment. Almost nobody thinks Dylan or Farrow is lying. They don’t have to be lying for Allen to be innocent.

But most people who doubt that Woody Allen molested Dylan don’t think that anyone is really lying. Honestly, the most probably scenario is that this is a case of false memory and contradictory subjective experiences. Before the day in question, Farrow had Allen in therapy because of what she perceived as Allen’s…

When a prosecutor states that they have enough to press charges that does not mean that they are stating that they think someone did it. I don’t know why this keeps going over peoples’ heads.

The convention of showing one’s shoulders in yearbook photos deserves its own thread. In my mother’s yearbooks this was taken to an extreme. The photos where close up so you couldn’t tell that the girls were really wearing clothes at all. In most of them you see a black slip. But it could have been a little feather…

Oh my God. Can we seriously do this? I want to write emails. “I find the male anchor’s lapel offensively reminiscent of Nazi uniforms. Please make him change his jacket or cover the lapel immediately.”

His statement gives me way more pause than the project itself.

Can I ask what you do? I am in a very similar boat right now because I work part time with a spa that is very “hippy woo” to borrow a phrase. Your pore size is linked to your chakra or whatever. And I also have someone in my family that I am on the verge of cutting off because of their “inability to escape their…

Of course not. Because it would be a different project. But the artist isn’t female. So what’s your point?

In real life I think the Trump bros would be pretty perturbed by hundreds of naked female bodies. Because they won’t look like what they see on the internet. But yeah, the media coverage would be: “Hoes!” (I don’t know how to pluralize that and I’m not looking it up.) The neocons would get a good chuckle out of it.

I’m not really thrilled with the “mirror” concept. The idea of women as “reflecting surfaces” is pretty... regressive. I don’t see how this is different from saying “you reflect the light of God.” It’s just replacing a male God with “nature”. The end result is the same: Women are dehumanized.

But the story that Rachel wrote isn’t about the sale of the piece. She actually misleads her readers by suggesting, and not hinting that its a joke, that the buyer is some rich eccentric who intends to put this piece in his home. She doesn’t know that. That’s probably not true. But its apparently misled a lot of…