Those are acquired infections. Exposures is the more relevant number...
4Reelz
4reelz
You know this was because he heard how conservative suburbs are turning blue and his decrepit brain could only come up with this nonsense.
The bad cops work with the “good cops” to get the actual good cops fired. It’s in policy and is SOP.
I saw that one, but it was more likely done to protect the bad cop from himself instead of doing the right thing. If a person wasn’t standing there filming while yelling about the knee on the neck, his partner wouldn’t have done anything to change it.
You should see the video of the two MAGA chuds waving a big Trump flag at a protest. One was being very belligerent and confrontational. Exchanged words with a protester which would be considered agreement to mutual combat. The second CHUD holds him back and he says something like “please let me have him”, which is an…
I would like to point out that the Obama Administration and intelligence communities wanted the focus on racist, white supremacist groups but the GOP balked and the funding would only be approved under the larger extremist umbrella.
Careful! The mere mention of “Antifa” can be construed as material support of a terrorist organization soon. I’m worried about all my laughing, reaction videos to the “Punch a Nazi” Antifa coordinated campaign. You may not have known this was a coordinated campaign unless you mainline Fox news, but I’m here to tell…
Just FYI
It has already been confirmed that he does not own a business in the area. He was “protecting” the bar he likes to drink at, which was already secured. He wanted to play tough guy because he’s bought into the narrative that his skin color makes him exceptional. He was handed an exceptional ass-kicking.
The umbrella was an easy visual cue to this guy’s handlers (cops) so they wouldn’t fuck his shit up if he got lost in a crowd or it was to avoid his face being captured by cameras mounted on the roof. Either is plausible.
Well we disagree on the INA. But it sounds like you might agree with the wider point that violence is required. The protest movement can take on an approach of non-violence to seek change, but the change does not come without violence. A movement can go either route, violent or non-violent protest, but violence is…
We’ll put aside how your’re being completely dismissive of the role the INA played in the British withdrawal. How about we settle on Mr. Harriet’s point. Non-violent protest does not bring about change alone, violence is required. The violence can come from the protesters or from their oppressors but someone’s blood…
Counter point: Ghadar revolutionaries and Indian National Army. Or are you saying Gandhi represented the totality of the resistance to British colonialism or that the non-violent protests were exclusively the impetus for the British withdrawal?
Being a positive person, I think it’s a reminder to himself to stop being a misogynistic asshole. BUT I’m also a realist and there’s no doubt the message is for everyone who rightfully hates him, because hate is their problem it’s not about him. Ann Curry should get a tiny violin tattooed and say it’s to remind these…
In addition, to what has previously been pointed out. The video everyone is familiar with is missing four minutes described as Mr. Arbery being pursued by the makeshift lynch mob including Mr. Arbery changing directions of travel to avoid the armed men requiring that the caravan of criminals pull at least one 180…
In addition, to what has previously been pointed out. The video everyone is familiar with is missing four minutes described as Mr. Arbery being pursued by the makeshift lynch mob including Mr. Arbery changing directions of travel to avoid the armed men requiring that the caravan of criminals pull at least one 180 turn …
Texan here. Cowboy Cosplay is a real thing, including driving massive, lifted trucks with a full brush guard, toolbox, and hauling package while living in a major metropolitan area and never so much as hauling a sofa. Fucking clown shoes.
The tagline: “Finally! The inaccuracy of the AK47 combined with the inaccuracy of a handgun!”
Yes, an employee of any government agency can be fired for speech. Free speech is not absolute and a government employee’s relationship with a government agency is an employee/employer relationship before private citizen protections are factored in.