434353o4u5oi34u53
345u345u3495u34535345
434353o4u5oi34u53

Yes, and thank you for correcting me. As a tangent, I think it's really cool that someone could learn English thanks to the Internet. We live in a fantastic time.

Not that Patricia Hernandez actually cares about supporting comic books or diversity in them, but maybe I can reach others who do!

Tumblr SJWs and Jezebel are working hard to make sure anything that makes a women even slightly uncomfortable categorized as rape. Eye rape, seat rape on the bus, asking a women out rape... it's all rape if it makes a women uncomfortable.

This is seriously one of the most disgusting things I've ever read. I can't even grasp how you can actually say and post things like this without being sarcastic. Have you never heard of 'innocent until proven guilty'? How is it up to him to prove that he didn't rape her?

Basically, as far as I can tell, the complaints are threefold:

He didn't need to start that conversation, he needed to defend himself. Being accused of a crime, especially rape, is serious business that can destroy lives.

What the fuck are you even on right now Patricia?

Why should he have to apologize for something he didn't do? He's trying to find some middle ground there, but he doesn't -have- to do that at all. I like Patricia's work, in general, but I think this article misses the mark. I'm a staunch feminist and I believe strongly in consent (to the point where I wouldn't even

Actually, if someone accuses you of rape AND YOU DIDN'T RAPE THEM, then NO, you SHOULDN'T care if someone GOT THEIR FEELINGS HURT and decided to exact revenge by ACCUSING YOU OF RAPE.

God, this is just so rich. A woman accuses him of rape, and now, all of a sudden, he's got to be the perfect gentleman/feminist/ascetic

No it's absolutely not. At least in the context you are using. We don't convict on probability and we shouldn't in the public view either.

Oh give over Patricia. I know this is a uncomfortable topic for you in the first place but to be honest your circle running is becoming tiring.

That's accusations made in the legal system. This is not that.

She's literally making up shit and going along with it now. Seeing only the shit she wants to see.

100% of rapists are human. I guess we're all guilty...

So are you saying, statistically, he's guilty?

Feminists won't be satisfied until college students routinely exchange waivers before making out.

What did you enjoy about the article?

This statement makes absolutely no sense.

Only partway through, but I don't see how his initial post was bad? I mean, he says he didn't rape her, provides his side of the story, and that's that.

He's not trying to start a conversation about consent, he's trying to make a response to an accusation that he sexually assaulted someone.