You don’t need to buy into a new system if you take your hydrogen and turn it into hydrocarbons. Or if you produce hydrocarbons instead of hydrogen.

The people that actually need range, like fleet customers with cars that spend the entire day on the road still go Diesel. My father used to work as a salesman and had to travel to customers often, and 400miles on a day were happening regularly. Any standard 2-litre Diesel would have 300 miles left after that, and a mo…

Many sectors simply won’t work properly without the energy density of hydrocarbons. A 2500ton airliner simply won’t fly, or if it does be too large for any airport. Same problem for road- and seafreight.

Especially so as Mercedes/Hamilton have not had rule changes directed against them like Red Bull/Vettel or Ferrari/Schumacher.

By Fuji 2007 I assume you are talking about the incident that Webber blamed on Hamilton?

Vettel is the only driver who won the title in a Newey-car in the last 20 years.

A german journalists who called Vettel being dropped much earlier than everybody else is rating that as very likely

It also wasn't the first time Hamilton made questionable move as the leader on a restart, he been brake checking the queue since 2007

This is only ever going to go one way:
He will be driving around in the midfield, will get a lot of praise from the media, become disgruntled, slam the team publicly, leave after two years.

I don’t know how much freight is outsourced, Kalitta and Atlas are the only ones I know that fly scheduled US-Ramstein flights.

The difference between the 747-8 and the 737MAX is that when the former was made Boeing had some engineering integrity left, while at the time the MAX was made it was all accountants chasing shareholder value.

I believe KLM and Qantas have both retired their 747, Qantas is offering farewell flights and Lufthansa has sold some 747-400, but is keeping all their -8 and newer -400.

The A400M is much smaller than a C5 or 747, it sits between the Hercules and the Globemaster in size. The only companies building very large freighters are Boeing and Antonov, and the Antonov is the only one with a shoulder wing.

I believe I read somwhere that the A380 was an option, but Airbus refused to apply because they would have been required to give a lot of  their technical details to the Air Force.

That race actually had no DNFs, all six cars that started finished.

The race felt like everyone forgot how to prepare a racecar over the last half year.

In the post I replied to You compared performance and not visibility. And while the ROI for visibility may be better than elsewhere, the cars are still ridiculously expensive for what they are.

I actually watched about 20 and visited one since the last FE race I watched. FE is just too MarioKart with fanboost and the other boost thing and too dishonest in marketing.

F1 is the wrong series to compare costs. F1 is much faster and has free development.

A guy on my street has a W123 as daily driver, that he street parks and that has no visible or hearable issues.