4130blue
IDriveEveryDay
4130blue

I hate this guys “car” for so many reasons, mostly revolving around the dumbass doing the mod work.

Saleen- “Hi, we need a rendering of a car for some marketing material. We need it right away since we save all the important stuff for last minute. Also, we don’t have any money to spend on this, since the visuals are not that important for our product.”

Well, here was an opportunity for some cross-genre 2 wheel fun that looks like it was ruined by testosterone.

This is a great idea. I was thinking maybe a, “___ days since the last idiot hit this bridge.” sign.

Did I miss the part of the article where we talked about a stanced and patina’d Porsche?

That syntax..... is this a movie starring Clark Gable?

People said this about the Prowler, the SSR, the Thunder Bird reboot, Porsche 924, etc etc . Some things are better left to the imagination.

I was just being the devils advocate here.

According to this thread all these cars are “Stanced” .

everyone on here is crying about how lame stance is, and all I can do is think about how EVERY BTC car is the same:

What about every BTC car? Are they stance?

Don’t listen to the trolls. This is the same guy that says “no replacement for displacement” Meanwhile the 2jz motors are pulling 400 whp on the daily.

Seriously, this whole thread sounds like my grandparents talking about how to work a DVD player.

How can you tell they have toe-in?

I agree with the Efficiency and add safety. Less need for glass means more room for structural and crash supports.

Depth perception. It works with a mirror. It does not work with a video screen.

Depth perception. It works with a mirror. It does not work with a video screen.

My only quandary is I see people driving with broken mirrors held together with duct tape all the time. Will that segment of the population be bothered to pay to fix a broken camera/monitor?