Hasn’t Toyota already had issues with offering remote start as a subscription? I think all automakers will do this to the extent that consumers will tolerate it.

Even newer cars can get totaled for dumb stuff.  If the cost to repair is a certain percentage is the value they total it.  With all the cameras and sensors outside the car I can see a crash being really expensive that may not cause much actual structural damage.

I had a girlfriend with an Impala that had that system.  It wasn't noticable until you pulled off the freeway and your ears were ringing from the radio.  Just make the dang car quieter to begin with

My Civic makes a nice transformer sound when I set the parking brake, so some cars are still fun

My guess is that most manufacturers would attach it to the same placers track that runs the window up thus giving you two options to not roll the window up when said track breaks

By the end of the run they still came standard with an LT1. Even though it wasn’t the LS1 that followed it was a solid performer. I do think the C5 is the Corvette to get but the C4 is still a decent performer and should have some collector status.

Honestly the person who put together the slide show should have done the minimal amount of vetting, or the definition of muscle car had been distorted to mean any American car that has rwd and a V8.  I have a hard time believing anyone who bought a Aspen RT considered it a muscle car, it was just the glam luxury…

Like most of the cars on the list these do not meet the criteria

Same on the Civic LX. I bought my 2018 sport hatch for half thier price

41k for a base Civic is crazy too.  I'm sure you can option a Accord for that money but it seems like thier plan is just under double MSRP for any car.

Although to be fair, the Chrysler interiors I have had usually look cheap but don't rattle too bad.  My ram from that era looks cheap inside with 5 shades of tan but it's quiet and the seat is comfortable

I hear the, the added performance you gain in snow isn’t worth the performance you lose on dry roads but if you are within 90 percent the limit of your all seasons on dry roads regularly you are probably driving like a jerk or at least in a manner that would get you called in to the highway patrol.  The handling of…

I’m not sure if this is some sort of survivor bias or what. I would say through driving a reasonable powered car in autocross I have decent throttle control. In snow with weight in 2wd I can get around in my pickup but not nearly as well as every single other vehicle on the roads. I guess to some they view that as…

I think it depends on the type of snow.  My ats on my pickup do well in cold powder which is often what we get on Montana.  In the slushy heavy stuff my Civic with blizzaks doesn't get going as quick but it sure drives around with less sliding.  I get that most of the country doesn't get snow frequently enough to…

Being 6"2 I would say it really depends on your build and proportions. I am mostly torso, so some cars fit me in the back seat better than others. If my head doesn’t hit the ceiling and my shoulders aren’t against the other passengers I am a ok. A Versa from having rented one would not be a comfortable 4 person travel…

Idk, this sort of thing yields engines like the world engine that Chrysler, Mitsubishi and Mercedes developed together.  Everyone will want a hand in the design and they will ruin it

I grew up around them and owned one.  I went from a Dodge Dakota to a S10 blazer in college because I wore out my Dakota.  It was a big step backward and I don't think other suv's like the Isuzu trooper were much or any better.  

Honestly I think some of the issue is people are quoting days from when SUVs were more commonly body on frame construction vs unibody cars.  A 93 S10 blazer was a roll over prone deathtrap that would dissipate energy poorly compared to a car.  The 90s was when I first remember hearing that suvs are more dangerous in a…

What were the bugs, I have read the history of the Airflows and they were safer and aerodynamic but the biggest critisism was that they were ugly.  The drivetrain was pretty much a carry over.

The car was great, but it was a risky venture.  The styling was based on airflow but was ugly and honestly very few people will buy a car that they think is ugly even if they know it is better.