Tonight, hot pork balloon Donald Trump will participate in a televised debate with n̶i̶n̶e̶ ̶R̶e̶p̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶a̶n̶ ̶p̶r̶e̶s̶i̶d̶e̶n̶t̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶d̶i̶d̶a̶t̶e̶s̶ eight other hot pork balloons and one hot pork Goodyear blimp.

He’s good at processing tools, but even better at processing stools.

Maybe he’s not an ambi-turner

Swims - rubber and mesh. Very comfortable.

Most points, fourth quarter

Sorry - don’t know - found it on t’ webs.

I have a simple rule in business which generally works. Get all stakeholders to put in estimates and work out the critical path. Add 20% contingency to it. Then double it. That’s your critical path and project budget.

The US military and US foreign policy has one simple function - to maintain the US dollar as the global currency for commodities and trade.

The “no more than x customers” is a British thing - it’s a response to a period where a ton of school kids would mob a store, distract the shopkeeper and rob it blind.

Which bit of "No" did you not understand? It's a one word answer to your question.

No. But your are a twat.

The guy went to hospital for his injuries. There was a good chance the doctor could report those injuries to the police. The fact is the producer didn't want for this to come out as he probably knew it would be the end of the show. Clarkson probably self reported it in case it came out in another way i.e the doc or a…

Have you ever heard of 'false equivalence'? Sorry rhetorical question. Obviously you haven't.

You can go stand by whatever you want - doesn't make you any less wrong. And just because you say I don't understand the meaning of semantics doesn't make you right.

Except a funeral or wake do not have to be religious. Which is why I specifically never mentioned religion in my post and why his comment is crap.

You don't "do" religion, you practice it - so you're syntactically wrong. And nowhere in my post did I mention religion - so you're semantically wrong.