I guess in the end, “Meet your new boss, the same old boss with a different name and look.”

Did the HHH vs Batista match add anything to wrestlemania?

I know they’d never do it, but the easiest way for WWE to lock down talent would be to just *make them actual employees*. Give them a regular salary and health care, and suddenly hustling your way from payday to payday on the indie circuit becomes a *lot* less appealing.

When you have 200+ wrestlers independent contractors under contract

Moore: It’s ridiculous that Mayweather is undefeated, you get him into a ring with Lennox Lewis in his prime and he’s toast. 

historic realities, the culture of negative partisanship and the impact of a strong jobs market will hurt the party’s already slim chances of winning.

Agreed, Clinton never really connected with voters. To people like me, it just seemed like she was running cause she had been ordained by Obama and Bill. I think she would have done a good job as president but like you said, when your main selling point is “I’m not the other person,” that rarely wins presidential…

She may have a plan, but she doesn’t have a chance. The democrats need to focus onfinding a candidate that can beat Trump.

John Edwards flamed out in 2008, but his campaign - not Obama’s - got the conversation rolling on what would become the Affordable Care Act

Unfortunately, she’ll never get past that misstep. She is too easy for Trump to lambaste with the vulgar “Pocahontas”

I wish she hadn’t claim Native American ancestry. I feel like that really hurt her and was sort of deserved.

Which is really similar to what happened to Clinton. You had one candidate putting forward serious suggestions for how to handle important issues in the country

So basically WWE would have a bunch of talented wrestlers just sitting around doing nothing. I guess in the end, WWE became more like WCW. 

Both are psychoactive drugs that impair your ability to work. So there is that.

and of course, “get off my lawn!”

The story and the linked story said operators of construction equipment can be tested and that supervisors of medical patients can be tested, but it is far from clear that operators of dangerous equipment in other non-security related, non-child supervisory industries can be tested. It is not clear that…

If and when he signs it, I will totally retract everything I said. 

This is a mistake. Employers should have this freedom.

It would probably be wise to read the article first before making dumb comments like you are. 

Of course it is. This is nonsense.