That was the most ridiculous attempt at an excuse for his behavior I think I've ever read, and all in an attempt to relieve the people who chose to vote for him of the burden of the knowledge that they were voting for a person that said unhinged, bigoted, racist things all the time.

"They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists."

I think his point was that Hitler aimed to kill a whole lot of people, and he did in fact actually kill a whole lot of people. By that standard, his own twisted one, Hitler was successful. Trump, on the other hand, will probably kill us all by trying to tweet with the Red Phone. Stupid and venal and ridiculously…

63 million people were presented with a choice: two restaurants.

By golly, you're right!

Let me put it this way, read the [link]AV Club review of the series finale, and the comment section afterward, and it puts in somewhat proper perspective how much the show belongs on the list.

Person of Interest should be on the list.

This indeed. I absolutely loved the novel, and the movie really ends up making a very different set of points than the book did. I oscillated between the uncharitable assumption that the Wachowskis didn't get the point and the more charitable one that they simply wanted to say something different. With the exception…

I guess you'll pass, then.

and you don't know if I do either

Declaring preemptive victory is a truly desperate sign. A giggle is the entertainment of children. What do you bring to the table besides insults and deprecations?

Nah. You're definitely not worth it.

Does that tactic usually impress your audience?

And so killing all the first-born of Egypt was not force but persuasion? She-bears persuading children to be more respectful using teeth and claw?

God has actually tried to help me change my asshole ways via some very clear signs.

Person of Interest's Season 3 finale used "Exit Music for a Film" pretty brilliantly, so there is certainly some competition for the title.

It actually seems like one shot puts them down if they are programmed to "die" when shot. In the first episode one of the hosts got shot multiple times and did not die, and is shown drinking milk that pours out the wounds; he had glitched to not record the supposedly fatal wound as fatal, and it didn't seem to slow…

But not every delivery of important information for the audience should be jam-packed with frisson and stress. "Big" character moments can be played small, and exposition can sometimes just be explanation. I think it is important, stylistically, to be able to use both the flashy actor-centric reveals and the more…

That reading makes sense, too.

Must I preface every statement with "I think…" or "It seems to me that…"?