Shit. I didn't even know Sam was in this.

Gonna be a big summer for geeks.

+1

I guess he would make a pretty awesome bad guy. But still, do they really need to make another Crow picture?

It's been awhile since I read it too, I guess I might have to dig it out.

Not as cheesy as the source material. That O'Bannon guy went to some dark(and melodramatic) places.

So, Brad's playing the reporter? Does anybody know?

I just can't believe they didn't turn the last 4 or so minutes into a musical montage.

Am I the only one who thinks that the original Crow was a good movie because of Brandon Lee and an excellent supporting cast were a perfect fit for the script. Which unfortunately had added poignancy from the tragic death of it's star?

Just as long as the ass and crotch regions don't get the transparent treatment.

The feet bug me. I don't know why, they just do.

I too am bummed by the loss of Symbionic Titan, but I watch it with my 8 year old and there was a lot of it that... um, how to put this delicately...went over his head.

As I sit at home convalescing, I have to tell you this really perked me up.

Yeah, if they did I'm sure they'd see a rise in revenue.

oops

Yeah, my brother sent me the set for my birthday one year and I wasn't all that excited about reading them. They sat on a shelf for 18 months before I picked them up over X-mas break awhile back. Read them both in 2 days, couldn't put them down.

I just realized that Tarsem would be perfect for a film version of Illium/Olympus.

Thanks for letting me know what RTG stood for.

I don't see any solar cells on the rover itself. So I'm assuming it's got a small Plutonium fuel cell(or something similar to what's on Cassini and Voyager). If that's the case that's good for dealing with some of the problems that Spirit and Opportunity rovers had(Dust,nightfall,etc) I'm just surprised that the…

I thought the exact same thing. There's a whole lot of moving parts going on hundreds of millions of kilometers away. I smell fail. ( I hope I;m wrong of course)