Pretty much what I was thinking as I read the write-up. GM’s Lee wasn’t wrong about lifestyles and buying habits. Wasn’t wrong about Apple (now). They made the mistake of ignore how Apple got there. Apple products were good after their revival. Once popularity was up, buyers cared less about the product and just…

There is no ROI. For many of them they are just hobbies of some rich playboy son of some royal SOB of some oil producing land.

It would be a more trailer park version of Swift. Oh... hmmm. BBIAB.

Nah, it should be called “Blimey!”

Oh brother...

That is not the point. The point is a single data point doesn’t warrant a conclusion.

Yes! absolutely.

Maybe a daily dose of Evoltis would help.

Didn’t say it was. It’s just meaningless—not enough data points to draw anything remotely close to a qualitative conclusion regarding the XC90s.

Lies. Damn lies. And statistics. For this stat to be of any significance you need to compare this stat to comparable car(s) of other marques and take into account their total numbers (in the same time frame). This alone tells us nothing other than a coincidence.

Yah it sounds like something us old farts (who aren’t excited by the M2 Competition) need to take to get it up.

Did anyone say it’s new? I don’t think so.

Nobody’s perfect. You?

Then it’s not really frameless.

Reality:

I remember a time when auto journalists complained about how much of a pain the SVX’s windows were for drive-thrus at McDonalds. Perfectly acceptable in a exotic, which the SVX wasn’t (despite what Subaru thought).

Clean lines. Less visual clutter. Also make the cabin/greenhouse look more spacious.

If desperate enough, yes. I don’t know of any conservative leaning Republican who would say yes without hesitation.

Just curious... what was her callsign in the Navy?

Art car!