Ha. I remember showing my parents the MR2 back then. And they said “what the hell do you want sports car for. They’re for playboys.” Then I also show them various pick up trucks, to those they laughed “what the hell do you want a truck for? only [lowly] construction workers and laborers drive them.” Yah, living with…

I used it twice for simplicity sake... for YOUR sake. But, it’s obvious you couldn’t handle that either.

Well, there you have it right there: “in a specific environment”. The system was designed for and assumes a specific environment. However, the real world is not specific. It’s varied. That is evident in what’s happened with this “re-creation” and the accident. Tesla can’t people from assuming “Autopilot” is full…

Yes, again, if you were a pilot or familiar with the pilot and co-pilot relationship you’d know that. Most people don’t. Per my point, Tesla need to use language of the general public, not their own. In laymen’s terms, if the autonomous system was the co-pilot, and you were the pilot, you still need to supervise the…

Yah, I can read. Can you? Like read the rest of the thread?

The flaw here is thinking that all drivers have the same aptitude and understanding as airplane pilots. IIRC, there are pretty extensive and specific requirements for obtain a pilots license? In contrast there are no rules requiring X number of hours in X type of passenger vehicle for a Class C driver’s license.

Indeed. The cars should be the least of our concerns.

It’s pretty clear that he knows nothing about anything... except for prostitutes and golden showers.

Hey, Tesla. You all are probably smarter than me (since you’re working there and I’m not). There’s a stupidly simple solution to this. Stop calling it “Autopilot” and call it something more along the lines of co-pilot or pilot-assist.

Judging by the people I encounter during my daily commute, the DMV probably passed this driver with a A- score.

Ah... it was a joke. Probably too soon.

piece? piece? as in rest in pieces? is this a joke?

Likely killed due to:

This needs to be a TV series.

Not sure what exactly you are arguing against or for. They were rearmed with American hardware so the American defense contractors could profit from supply and support. With little thought to the possibilities of the stuff ending up in the wrong hands, like it has now, or they simply didn’t care.

And all this traces back to the decision to invade Iraq AND disbanding the existing Iraqi army. Then, because of the military industrial complex, arming the new army with American hardware.

Neutral... Business as usual; continue to explore setting up shop in China. The Chinese market is a significant one, it hasn’t been Tesla’s primary market. For them, they have bigger immediate problems at hand. First off, I’d have Elon take a break from Twitter (and making further outlandish promises that set up…

Plus, didn’t Trump buy Chinese steel for his construction projects instead of supporting American steel workers?

It’s funny how people provide support for their argument... only as far as it remains plausible, stopping short when it doesn’t.

And the people who build his hotels (whom he’s not paying anyway).