Heh, Nice try guy! I said FEMINISTS not women.

I said until FEMINISTS have empathy for men, I have no empathy for FEMINISTS. Not women. Hell I AM a woman. Nice try trying to equivocate your conspiracy theory based movement, with an entire gender.

Um, you have repeatedly referred to “nicking,” “pricking,” and “poking” the clitoris as, basically, a small thing, as if you have any idea how excruciatingly painful it can be, and you keep comparing it to male circumcision in order to demonstrate how small a thing it is.

“ calling people liars for not using the exact wording you prefer”

imagine a world, where in america females routinely had their genitals mutilated, and in Africa and Malaysia and the like, both boys and girls routinely had their genitals mutilated.

Then a bunch of Men’s rights activists constantly bitch about what happens to boys, over there! and if you try to speak what is happening…

I have said that SOME male genital mutilation is worse than SOME female circumcision.

This is a simple fact that you cannot deny. The removal of the foreskin can, later in life, lead to painful erections, erectile dysfunction, it is often done without anesthesia (even in the west) which sends the baby into shock from…

Nicking is not the partial or total REMOVAL of genitalia.

Jezebel is portraying it as if all women who undergo female circumcision are having “partial or total removal of genitalia”

Let me show you again

“A harrowing new report from UNICEF has found that at least 200 million women and girls in 30 countries have been…

Why does it upset me? because we live in a country where it is legal and common place to mutilate the genitals of baby boys, and when you speak about it you are met with people who defend it and derail by pointing to women abroad who get circumcised.

Then on top of that feminists like jezebel LIE in order to trump up…

So nicking the clitoris which has 8,000 nerve endings, is somehow worse than removing the foreskin which has 20,000 nerve ending.

A.) I’m not sure if a tiny scar would cause pain for the rest of a person’s life
B.) a small nick on the clitoris, which may or may not scar, sounds a lot better than removing foreskin from the penis (which leaves a scar as it turns out!)

Still, it’s not 70 million women had their clitoris and their labia removed, and…

yes because a total removal of the clitoris and the labia is basically the same thing as a nick on the clitoris.

heh, and yet even if you try to talk about male genital mutilation on it’s own, feminists will come in and say you are derailing and talk about how female circumcision is just infinitely worse.

you’re comparing the absolute worst case scenario to the absolute least worst case scenario.

some female circumcision is a simple ritual nick on the clitoris.

And removing all of the skin from the entire penis and removing the glans isn’t healthy either.

But we’re not talking about the absolute worst case scenario are we? feminists always want to compare the worst female circumcision to the least invasive male genital mutilation.

Little harm? are you fucking kidding? I guess sending a baby boy into shock from such an overload of pain by mutilating his genitals has no effect on their developing brain.

Meanwhile, feminists look at things like ‘ritual nicking’, lump it into female circumcision and then present it as if all female circumcision is…

Whats interesting is that countries where there is female circumcision also have myths about upsides... like easier to clean, lowers risk of certain diseases etc.

what a weird coincidence. It’s almost as if people will invent reasons to defend barbaric cultural practices of the culture they are involved in... huh.

it’s less dangerous because it happens in a medical setting when preformed in the west (you know... because it’s legal AND common), not because the procedure is less dangerous inherently.

Also less painful? citation needed.

Key word, EARN. pay discrimination based on sex or gender is illegal.

the ‘pay gap’ which is just the median pay of all women compared to all men, is simply the result of choices of individuals.

Women work less hours (men work 56% of all hours worked in the country or to put it another way, for every hour a man works…

Fair enough, but this just raises the question: why do women live longer than men?

(hint: the difference in life expectancy has gotten closer together since women entered the work force en masse, and today we still see men work more hours per week on average, more years consecutively on average, more years total on…

huh... then why is it that more money is spent on women’s healthcare EVEN IF YOU EXCLUDE ALL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE COSTS.

Also is literacy misogynistic too?

And how do you explain that more money is spent on women’s healthcare in total than men’, even if you exclude ALL reproductive healthcare costs?

is that also misogyny?