LOL you bet they would. I think it’s outrageous

Not necessarly demented but most people by age 60 are not in their mental prime I think that’s obvious. To analyze all the testimonies and evidence of a 3 or 5 months long trial I would want people who do not get easily tired doing it.

Yep one man is no better than 12 if that one is a moron or biased why would the verdict be better than coming from 12. The jury system is fine, the criteria by which jurors are selected are not fine. High school dropouts 80 year old Alzheimer patients or rabid racists all can end up as jurors.

“most powerful entertainers in the United States”

“The person accused of a crime is given a ton of advantages at the start”

“The person accused of a crime is given a ton of advantages at the start”

Jurors should be limited to people between age 25 and 60 and pass a test which examines their ability to think logically. Frankly because of idiot jurors if I was falsely accused of a crime in a lawsuit I would settle if I could afford it. I wouldn’t trust the jury system at all. Too many innocent people have been…

I needed to read that headline three times before I still didn’t believe it.

COSBY: If you drug and rape women don’t admit giving drugs to women you want to have sex with. It can confuse a lot of people, kids. Next question.

Indeed that would be a big lie unless she meant physical contact with him as in meeting him in person but did you read the transcript of his testimony or you got this in the media? I’d like to read the actual testimony and I can’t find it online.

Williams is famous not necessarily rich, he is certainly a celebrity. Tupac and Tyson and Brown are as famous if not more than Cosby and OJ as no one gives a fuck about Cobsy and OJ outside the US Tupac Brown and Tyson were/are international stars. OJ was not richer than Brown or Tupac. In any case what do you mean?…

I watched the show back in the 90s but in no way did I ever view Cosby as “America’s dad”. He was just an actor and an arrogant asshole in real life even before Hannibal Buress made the media finally pay attention to his rapey ways.

By alibi I meant that OJ didn’t give a plausible explanation as to where he was during the murders. Or did he? I might be wrong on that.

Till was not accused of rape. And black women also accused him. They are not Ruby Bates. There was medical evidence that bitch. There is no evidence Cosby’s accusers are liars.

And exactly what kind of power is that supposed to be? His spokesman is deluded. Cosby is toast. He has no power at all.

Tupac Mike Tyson were both convicted. They were celebrities too.

Based on comment on social media and various websites I’m pretty sure most Americans do not see him as America’s dad anymore. Americans have a habit if convicting men accused of sex crimes based on nothing but what they see and here in the media. Not that it’s always wrong, most of Cosby’s accusers have no credibility…

You want to say more people have child abuse experience than fraud, theft physical assault, drugs, DUI or disorderly conduct? I doubt it.

True the police is supposed to be trustworthy but there’s plenty of evidence which cannot be altered by the police such as witness testimonies or OJ’s lies about his shoe. OJ had no alibi for the period when the murders were committed. That is also evidence which the police has nothing to do with. It can also be…

Why how many rich and famous black man got away with it because they were rich and famous? Tupac Mike Tyson Chris Brown Katt Williams were convicted. OJ was lucky, got a revenge verdict for Rodney King thank Mark Furhman and the LAPD’s racist fuckery. R Kelly got away with it because there was no way to know for…