The second category does not follow from the police tampering with some of the evidence. It’s possible to establish beyond any doubt whether certain evidence was tampered with or not. It’s a fallacy to think that because some evidence was planted all evidence might have been tampered with.

No OJ was actually found not guilty. Cosby at best will get a hung jury then he could be retried and I hope he will be.

Yes but there were plenty of non-planted evidence against OJ and he lost the civil case 12 to 0. Mj’s corrupt accusers didn’t even try a civil case after losing in criminal court because their own lawyer Larry Feldman told Larry King that the mother was wacko and it was all about money and he didn’t believe them.

What exactly is creepy about these I will never understand. MJ was a pure soul in a sex obsessed dirty minded society.

MJ and Cosby are nothing alike in fact if you take a closer look the differences make it obvious why Cosby is guilty and MJ was innocent:

80 year olds on a jury? Not a good idea.

There is no physical , medical or taped evidence backing up any of the other accusers either. No eyewitness to any of the assault. So which would be stronger than this case? Fact is Constand has no ulterior motive and the inconsistencies in her story are not relevant. Her story adds up. There was no physical, taped…

In real he said she said cases where the woman lies she has some ulterior motive or she is mentally ill. Constand is mentally fine and intelligent. And what would be her ulterior motive? She already got her money. She gains nothing from going through this. Why would she want Cosby behind bars if she is not a real…

Well there are people who even plead guilty even though they are innocent. Clyde Ray Spencer for example entered an Alford plea after being accused of raping three kids. He was innocent and exonerated many years later. But Cosby didn’t really admit guilt. He said it was consensual they just used drugs like many others…

Setting up a fund, thereby admitting that yes I raped all these women wouldn’t have helped his reputation obviously. Since the new prosecutor promised to go after him and Constand was eager to put him behind bars the criminal charges would have happened regardless of any compensation for the other victims. I don’t…

10 whites 2 blacks.

I sure would have presented it if I had been a prosecutor. Innocent people who are falsely accused of such crimes do not behave like Cosby did. They are shocked, angry, frustrated, depressed, you can see it in their body language, tone of voice, spontanous reaction of shock and disbelief. Watch his interviews you…

The biggest “apologists” for Michael Jackson are the very kids who spent the most time with him including those who had the most sleepovers with him Frank and Eddie Cascio, Brett Barnes, Mack Culkin, Emmanuel Lewis, Omer Batthi, Sean Lennon, Corey Fledman among many others. And that is just one of many…

Except he was right. MJ was innocent Cosby is guilty. The two cases are nothing alike.

It’s common to send the jury back to deliberate after the first report of deadlock.

Exactly what do you think MJ should have gone to jail for? MJ was found not guilty because his accusers and the DAs were full of shit. In a nutshell:

Not the same. Cobsy is not a hero for many blacks like OJ was. And the police and the DA were very fair toward Cosby, no Mark Furhman in his case.

And because it was a revenge verdict for Rodney King and the decades of LAPD racist fuckery.

Yes most people are too dumb which is why Americans repeatedly try and convict people in the media including people on this very site, believing whatever they read or hear just because it’s being “reported”. No fact checking no common sense. That’s how most believed Kelly Michaels was guilty or the Arvizos were poor…

The fact that articles like this