By the reaction, one would think the Dept of the Interior was comparing the size of Trump’s hands, and not the size of Trump’s crowd. Anyway, Trump should get a better turnout today at the Women’s March.
By the reaction, one would think the Dept of the Interior was comparing the size of Trump’s hands, and not the size of Trump’s crowd. Anyway, Trump should get a better turnout today at the Women’s March.
Oh, you know it.
And isn’t that just basically all the gross irony in the Western Hemisphere.
Posting facts and attendance estimates is not shit posting.
Motherfucking inbreds still say Obummer ?? WTF is that for at this point?
No, we already have Fox
NPS routinely provides the estimates for any gatherings on the National Mall, including inaugurations. I wonder if the Trump administration will now ban them from doing so, then release their own inflated numbers.
That is not a hatch act violation, a agency that runs the area posted a comparison of the current inauguration vs the last one. Just because a fact is inconvenient to one party does not make it partisan or political.
How is this comparative photograph political speech?
So if NOAA tweets a picture of polar sea ice from winter 1986 compared to polar sea ice from winter 2016, NOAA should be prohibited from using Twitter. Comparing conditions from two similar events is a partisan opinion. How about when the monthly labor report comes out and, say, the Labor Department tweets the…
Notoriety Douglas Factor gonna be a killer for this dude/dudette. God speed, cool NPS twitter person.
only the president gets to shitpost.
To be fair it was a post about the NPS. The National Mall is run by the NPS.
Comparing crowds on property that is managed by the NPS is NOT a “shitpost”. Trumplethinskin strikes again.
Show us the damage to the National Park Service.