There is zero chance they were trying to pull the whole tree .It's only the big lowest branch they wanted down.You can see by the way that branch shakes as they pull and even a little by the angles.
There is zero chance they were trying to pull the whole tree .It's only the big lowest branch they wanted down.You can see by the way that branch shakes as they pull and even a little by the angles.
Aircraft carrier - a warship with a flight deck on which aircraft can be launched and landed.
Tickets to the match were sold exclusively on Stubhub.
But see, it's not a mildly stupid thing he said. It's a TREMENDOUSLY stupid thing he said, and Drew is absolutely correct in his assessment that it shows how badly Simmons wants to seem like a superior thinker, and how horrifically out of his element he is in that regard.
Offsetting penalties? They must have gotten Saad for entering the wrong bench. He probably stole a water bottle.
He should have given Saad a double minor. 2 for roughing the Detroit bench with his head, and 2 for roughing the ice with his back.
These morons deserve everything they get. Its a federal offense
Have you been really stoned before? Like really, really, really high? It's hard to describe but if you have you know what I'm talking about. You know there is a point where you shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car. It should be treated like drunk driving.
Meanwhile, Gawker took $90,000 to get video of a fat man smoking a crack pipe.
Doesn't God work in mysterious ways, everyone? In the face of such a tragedy, he's always there to remind us of the one fact that can hold us together, through thick and thin: that Wolf Blitzer is an oblivious fucking asshole.
Ordinarily, this would call for some snarky comment. But as I'm presently watching the news of a couple dozen children killed in a school, that dude's shirt just doesn't matter.
Jane Gross to Roger Angell in his 1979 New Yorker story, "Sharing the Beat" (subscription required):
Buck doesn't really look angry. He just looks like Buck. I agree with the other poster who said back story is necessary. Because as screwy as baseball rules and umpiring can be, I'm having a hard time imagining a situation in which both managers are pissed.
Why can't the author provide some sort of context, or at least a link to the acutal story? Why should I have to do research to figure out exactly what's going on here?
This whole thing is a mess and I hate it, but I'm trying to figure it out for the sake of doing so. What is your point, Sam? Here's my list of every point I think you're trying to make [my comments in brackets]:
This article is bullshit rationalization of a troubling social trend. I would think a writer, of all people, would appreciate the need for people to have the capability to work independently. If you're going to make a scientific breakthrough, you can't just ask someone else what the right answer is - nobody else…
The "related" inserts really mess up the flow of reading in the post.
Off Topic Formatting Feedback.
The weird interspacing of the related articles really distracts from the flow of the article. I would recommend a sidebar or something like the "backstory" feature that was also rolled out today.
Water? On your freshly washed car? The horror is absolute.
Those wheels really kill the look, in my opinion.