When did I jump to conclusions? I simply said that I shouldn't have to play the DLC to find something major like this out. And I definitely shouldn't have to google something or look up ME wiki's either.

Thanks for the info...

Not at all, Im complaining that such a major plot point wasn't included in the main game. As far as I'm concerned, The Arrival ending is much better than the ending of the real game.

Interesting, I knew that you could give the Illusive man shit at the end, but I didn't know that resulted in quitting Cerberus.

Well obviously I could look it up, and probably will. My point is that its annoying that such a huge part of the 2nd game (Shepard being in Cerberus and his relationship with the Illusive Man), isn't resolved and carried over to the 3rd game. Instead, they decide to come to the conclusion of the reason behind the…

Uh...yeah...and I know the Illusive Man was pissed that I destroyed the thing...but It didn't seem like the breaking point of their relationship...I expected that suspense to carry over into ME3, as a sub-plot, the growing tension between Cerberus, the Illusive Man and Shepard.

Well thats stupid. So in order to get the entire story, one needs to purchase the DLC? Thats ridiculous. I mean, the "end" of ME2 did leave me to question the goals of the Illusive Man and Cerberus, but I expected that suspense to carry over to the next game. Now I have to start up ME3 with no idea what happened to my…

Its called a "teaser" for a reason...the whole point is basically "here is the new game we are working on, more to come later"...

The last time I checked, Shepard worked FOR Cerberus...

Really? They named it the Infidel? I mean common, really Spectre?

Or any profession that deals with any type of physical documentation...

Why ANYONE is being charged is fucking beyond me. The phone is out Apple!! Why go after the small fries?

How hilarious would it be if part of Anon was trying to hack Facebook, and another part of Anon was trying to stop the hack?

I'd have to agree with both of you. I agree with you because of your last sentence, and I agree with saturns2k because one can learn a lot about how to do their job from actually immersing themselves within the game environment. How can one really know what type of emotion to portray during the attack on the Collector…

Maybe because Hollywood has to hooked to the concept of organized crime being the Italian Mafia. When really all a group needs to be categorized as an Organized Crime is a centralized leadership structure, which it is slowly becoming apparent that Anonymous has.

Because networks like CNN don't want to take the chance of labeling a black man a "drug dealer"...

Is there anything more counter-productive and hypocritical than rioting?

Originally, the concept of Anonymous and the people involved was fairly simple. And until the Sony "hack" and the establishing of LuLzSec, they generally did pretty well at hiding under the Anonymous guise. But they are slowly bringing themselves into different territory.

I'll agree that her left side is sexy...

God I get annoyed at these crowds way more than I should...this is what happens when the internet takes physical form...