I’ve had it a total of twice, both times were not my choice and I didn’t pay for it. Any other fucking questions?

You seek out places like that, don’t you.

It was. Before the 80's - definitely 70's if not late 60's.

It was.

Back then it was called "fuck buddies" 

CFA has good food, and free donations to bigotry with every order!  My GFs kids love CFA, but I refuse to take them there.

This, of course, is representative of the C3 edition, which ran from 1969 to its long-overdue demise in 1982.

I wanted to give it a Nice Price. Getting that interior back together would probably be a nightmare for me, but for someone who’s more familiar with the car maybe not.

Fair point but throw the old CEO in jail for a night. These corporate shenanigans will never end until those at the top are held to some level of personal responsibility. 

Mine is a 1970 Nova SS 4 door wagon. Might use the back of a Hornet wagon 

3 cheers for the jalopni-munity! it is 100% awesome that that someone can post something zany like this on here and there is a substantial chance that someone will respond “oh, that’s my friend’s dad’s vehicle”!

Well whatever golden parachute those old execs got should go to these plaintiffs. I know it wont’ but that shit would stop if they knew stuff like this would happen.

You realize not all investors are greedy, right? NONE of the ones I know are greedy and I’m surrounded by them. They’re happy to earn slightly more than the rate of inflation. (Yes, I realize greedy investors exist. I’d wager the majority of investors in Hertz didn’t even realize it before all this happened. Hertz was…

To that point, I hope everyone had their record cleared since the cars weren’t actually stolen.

Attorneys take up to 40% on contingency and then they take out costs (I’ not sure if every state is that way but most seem to be). So for class action contingency cases it does often wind up being well over 50%.

Assuming this is a class action (is it? unsure) the typical cut the attorneys take is 33-40%. For settlements this size it’s usually closer to the smaller percentage. So, the clients will likely do even a bit better, which is good!

True, for the victims, but for Hertz, this was a bargain and really of no consequence, since the payment isn’t even coming out of their pocket. As much as the new CEO might claim otherwise, there is no reason to believe that Hertz has been punished like they deserve or has learned their lesson.

This is good, even if the lawyers take 50% that will still leave $84 million for 365 people to split. so $230,000 a piece approx. that’s actually a somewhat meaningful amount of money for each person.

No

I think that’s cheese, but there could be one for butter too.