Kind of insane the video doesn’t exist (but a video of Granderson robbing Sizemore does???). Anyway here’s a photo of the catch at least.
Kind of insane the video doesn’t exist (but a video of Granderson robbing Sizemore does???). Anyway here’s a photo of the catch at least.
if your business can’t make money while paying your workers living wage, then your business isn’t viable
yes
yeah, obviously. if you can’t ethically make money then you shouldn’t do it. what kind of dumbass question is that
Great thing about finance articles is that they never consider the ethical implications behind makin’ money.
Well the germs on the surface of the chicken are more deadly than the bacteria actually in the chicken — you don’t even need to cook your chicken if you wash it!
Those same people would probably have a mega aneurysm
People that want individual awards to be dependent on team metrics are sociopaths. I’m not sure it’s worth arguing anymore.
Yes. The player with the most value is the best player. And the argument you’re trying to make is actually the exact opposite in reality.
I guess technically you’re right, in that the player that provides the most value to his team is also the best player.
it’s for the one who provides the biggest value to their team.