1rabbit2rabbits1000rabbits
1Rabbit2Rabbits1000Rabbits
1rabbit2rabbits1000rabbits

This is Gawker Media in a nutshell:

Oh yay, it's today's mandatory article about men being assholes in every form of media and women being victims in everything.

The best thing about HD is you can see his soul leave his body.

So, I should treat it as a hobby, but all the people flinging shit at us can treat it as a personal identity, for the sole purpose of justifying their shit flinging? You do see the problem with that, right?

From what I've seen, the worst part about this whole GamerGate thing is the fact that it's a hash-tag on fucking Twitter. You have people using it for the sole purpose of shitting on anyone that plays games. You have people using it to say ISIS is a better group of people than gamers. And then when gamers fight

So we have Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian and Phil Fish, Nathan Greyson, Ben Kuchera, Stephen Totilo. That seems like primarily men to me. Not to mention that the SJW's are harassing quite a few men as well. Hell SJW's are even harassing women opposed to them. You really don't have a moral high ground.

HA. He is in damage control mode, and lying through his teeth. If he wanted to foster discussion he would do an article on the considerable corruption occurring instead of covering his ass and blaming gamers again.

Make sure to mention that was added on like 2 years after the fact. And is a carefully worded lie of omission, we know for a fact they were more than friends.

Really Nathan Greyson now identifies as a woman? Phil Fish? It's worth noting that you unquestioningly follow Kotaku's word and have no real understanding of the situation or what misogyny means.

I am at once closer to and further removed from the concern than you seem to be.

I am closer because I am "an old." I'm in my 30's, and I remember when liking video games got my ass kicked outside of school in the 80's. As much as I hate to say "I bled for this," I more or less did.

That figures in when outlets like Ko

Gamers are as furious as they are because of a plethora of issues, one cropping up right after another. It started with Quinn, sure, but what's rustling people's jimmies is that gamers are being used as a scapegoat for pathetic scum to get sympathy for being "opressed". These false flags are well-documented. (I won't

I wish you'd talk a little about the Cards Against Humanity rape accusation versus the Zoe Quinn ex-boyfriend issue. I feel like when you compare how those two issues were handled here at Kotaku it does not reflect well on you guys.

I've heard a cacophony of vague complaints that game journalism is too distracted with this social issue or that or not playing it straight enough about just focusing on games .... or all sorts of other perennial complaints that these days manifest as complaints about "social justice warriors," a pejorative for game

What about this bullshit?

Part of diversity is listening to viewpoints other than your own. One of the big points I have taken from #GamerGate is that many gamers are feeling marginalized because our viewpoints aren't "cool." If I dare to say that I care about good games with good story and can't care less if they feature women/gays/other

Jack Thompson, a non-gamer with a political cause, entered the fray a number of years ago, and was laughed out of the room, by both gamers and the gaming press.

There have been more than a few posts (particularly Hernandez's post relative to one of the originators of Cards Against Humanity) that have required later edits—primarily because the evidence did not support the editorial bent being taken in the same.

Let me put it this way: Hernandez's story relative to the guy who

What drove Gamergate is gamers feeling they found clear reasons for journalist and bloggers to lose the moral authority that they have been asserting for a few years now. Lots of people who support it feel some type of way about different things, but I think that's what drove it. Gamers have been given the impression

For the most part, I've been on Kotaku's side in this thing.

I will say, however—even if it sends me to the grays—that the retconning of the response issued by this site and its contributors is shamefully self-fellating.

There is a time and a place for editorialism—and if Kotaku seeks to position itself as an editorial

I was staying with a friend who has a hairless cat. After I left my instructor a voice message without properly hanging up the phone I sang my 'you're so warm and naked, slap you on the butt' song to her cat. Over and over and over. I realized it waaaaay too late, he never looked at me normal again.