He would not be just as bad, as he likely would not violate the rule of law so continuously, and would probably not abdicate the United States' place on the world stage as continuously as Trump is.

There is, however, evidence of considerable racist rhetoric around the Brexit vote. Whereas the absence of evidence does not speak to the matter.

I've heard stories about those things turning around in as little as three days!

Your attempt at being clever is pathetic in both its failure and in how drawn-out that failure is.

Get started on what? The paper itself points that out.

Luckily, you can nullify the harmful effects of french fries by smothering them in cheese curds and gravy.

Goddammit I was about to go shopping. Guess it's a stay-in day.

In good protest news, anti-corruption political protests in Russia!
http://www.cbc.ca/news/worl…

I made this RIP two days ago in the RIP Adam West thread. You're late, AV Club.

"mean that any sort of prejudice like xenophobia or misogyny is clearly not going to be served by a labour vote at all."

Militant Nazi assaults someone isn't a fun story, even if the guy is an alt-right troll.

I don't know this site nor Pajiba, but I know that I like this site's layout better.

You're both two people doing the same thing because you get something out of it. The difference is that he gets money.

It doesn't necessarily comment on that at all actually. Individuals prioritize different things in different situations. In some political contexts prejudice could guide their decision-making, while in other situations they might prioritize economic considerations.

"It's such a lazy and predicable form of content"

:'‑(

Why anyone would complain about a powerful person being represented as Julius Ceasar in that play is beyond me. Unless of course they're revanchists with a massive persecution complex and poor critical thinking capabilities.

Even before checking, I knew that the upvote on this comment was going to belong to the person who wrote it.

Good call.

It's only "obvious" if you don't know anything about the situation and simply assume the thing you want to be true is true. On the other hand, even a cursory knowledge of the play makes it clear that interpretation is ridiculous.