1cba3
Nope
1cba3

Did you miss the part where I said the vast majority of drugs come in through already established entry points? They don’t smuggle them in through the middle of the desert, that’s absurd. They hide them in vehicles and drive in through border checkpoints. The DEA and even John Kelly himself have acknowledged this.

he explained that players will often move or even lightly toss the ball right after the play in order to manipulate where the ref spots the ball.

Yeah, undocumented immigrants are a net positive revenue source. They pay taxes and pay into SS, and largely don’t receive any public services or benefits.

Also, most of the drugs that are actually ruining people’s lives are coming from American pharmaceutical companies and over-prescribing doctors.

Mexico with the cartels or Syria with Assad and sarin gas.

Anyone who actually cares about preventing movement over the border would be against building a physical wall. Even the border patrol don’t want it. They want more and better sensors, more man-power, and drones. A wall would be ridiculously ineffective and ridiculously expensive.

The offensive player cannot enter the crease area to score. Entering is putting a body part onto the floor, so jumping in and releasing (or punching) the ball before you hit the ground is OK.

I honestly don’t think Bjelica should have been ejected. It looked mostly like self-defense from him, and the headlock ended the violence pretty well.

Note that you still go to jail for manslaughter ;)

Handing out food has the clear potential to “directly affect the health and safety of other people” (unless it’s sealed and not tampered with, I guess. But even then it’s still affecting other people at some level). So no, there is no difference. Arguing “religious freedom” in this case would be absurd (though

But the whole “I get to do whatever I want because of my religion” is a terrible road to go down, which we’re already seeing with Hobby Lobby and wedding cakes.

Chill out, man. I think they were just asking if the law bans feeding your pet while walking through a park.

Well my religion says I need to purposefully infect people with Hep A. Is that protected, under the first amendment?

Now playing

Seems entirely plausible, but remember that police also said this guy punched a horse:

Wage disparity plus high cost of living in nicer areas plus year-round tolerable weather in the Mediterranean climate areas of Southern California. The state is also very large with a diverse amount of needs, has a very high population density in a select number of areas - San Diego area, which El Cajon is in, seems

Mongo only pawn in game of life.

These are the kinds of fresh, inventive, and super edgy comments that really make Deadspin such an amazing place.

If the activists are giving out prepackaged, processed food, the city’s going to have a hard time. But if the activists are giving out anything fresh, hot, homemade, or raw (fruit, vegetables)... well, there are public-safety health laws in place for a reason.

Which first amendment right is being infringed? Association? I’m not sure I see it. Seems more likely to be a violation of substantive due process. This is a law that is designed to harm a maligned class of people: the homeless, which no basis for it outside of NIMBYism.