Hey, lighten up.
Nope
1cba3
I wish he had started in Malheur. Folks who claimed at the time that bringing the hammer down on those people would just rile them up were talking out of their asses. They were armed, occupying Federal property, shooting at the FBI, and broadcasting their seditious plans live on YouTube. Nobody outside of the…
Well, this is literally terrorism. Politically motivated violence. Its practically textbook.
No you moron. If that guy was shooting out the window of his car or walking through the crowd shooting, people would be going to the morgue instead of the hospital.
The biggest, most dangerous, most active terror group in America is and has always been angry white men. Too bad Obama couldn’t send the drones to take out some of their leaders.
Who said gun control will solve all our problems? It’ll help solve one problem - guns.
Shit, when did they make crossing the street illegal?
This was a bad take.
Now playing
They were crossing the street at a fucking crosswalk.
They were crossing the street, apparently?
It feels like it’s straight out of a mediocre spy movie. It’s a code-name in a Bourne ripoff.
Alonso was at full speed coming at him, and when he makes his lunge to tackle, Flacco had not yet given himself up. You can see the moment when Flacco realizes he’s going to get hit, and tries to slide even though he knows it’s too late. This is completely a normal football play by Alonso, but it’s a shame that…
“Follow up question Senator Cornyn: is there literally anything he could say or do that would cause you to stop endorsing him?”
To me, that’s like saying the robotics club shouldn’t exist either. Or any activities on a college campus that are funded by another part of the college.
Why is it one or the other? Come on, you’re being disingenuous now.
1) It’s hard to make the argument the subsidies were illegal, since the ACA literally requires that the government make these payments. The argument that they are illegal turns on an extremely formalistic reading of what is required for a valid “appropriation” to be made. But it is clear that NOT making the payments…
What an asshole judge. His argument seems to revolve around two things:
Yep, that’s what I’m saying.
It’s a good law to have, but the enforcement is awful. Re-write the law to more clearly allow work-related knives, and/or find someone willing to crackdown on police officers abusing the law. Getting rid of it entirely seems like the wrong move to me.