If they’re going to jerk him around to save cap space, they better not try to recoup the bonus money. He’s doing them a favor.

Well, it would only take 2% of the tax break, apparently. So at the very least the government could give them that much, and then set a livable wage.

So you’re confused why people would rather the government mandate a living wage by law, instead of bribing corporations with a few billion dollars each, of which only 2% goes to regular employees?

Incognito is one of the biggest shitbags in all of sports, and he deserves no good will. Fuck that guy.

It’s because it’s visually closer to objects on the ground, giving you something to compare it to.

...appearing slightly bigger and about 14 percent brighter than normal.

It sounds like you’re describing a baseball museum (does this exist?), not the hall of fame.

Vince and it’s not close.

I’m gonna go get you a stat on that.

Did you miss the part where I said the vast majority of drugs come in through already established entry points? They don’t smuggle them in through the middle of the desert, that’s absurd. They hide them in vehicles and drive in through border checkpoints. The DEA and even John Kelly himself have acknowledged this.

he explained that players will often move or even lightly toss the ball right after the play in order to manipulate where the ref spots the ball.

Yeah, undocumented immigrants are a net positive revenue source. They pay taxes and pay into SS, and largely don’t receive any public services or benefits.

Anyone who actually cares about preventing movement over the border would be against building a physical wall. Even the border patrol don’t want it. They want more and better sensors, more man-power, and drones. A wall would be ridiculously ineffective and ridiculously expensive.

This is really lazy writing. Cute, but not useful.

I honestly don’t think Bjelica should have been ejected. It looked mostly like self-defense from him, and the headlock ended the violence pretty well.

Note that you still go to jail for manslaughter ;)

Handing out food has the clear potential to “directly affect the health and safety of other people” (unless it’s sealed and not tampered with, I guess. But even then it’s still affecting other people at some level). So no, there is no difference. Arguing “religious freedom” in this case would be absurd (though…

Chill out, man. I think they were just asking if the law bans feeding your pet while walking through a park.

Well my religion says I need to purposefully infect people with Hep A. Is that protected, under the first amendment?

Ok, but if they’re talking about poor roster construction and aging support players that can’t play defense, wouldn’t that be.... them?