It evens the playing field a little bit so the guy with the biggest pocketbook isn't guaranteed a win. You can show up with the highest horsepower engine in the field but when you can't keep the front end down you don't have an advantage.
1993Miata
1993Miata
No. It's all in chassis setup and how you apply the power.
The car in the other lane didn't have a problem.
Weight. Cost. Ease of manufacturing.
If it's a proper material there is nothing wrong with plastic in this application.
But but, he cruises some backroads and can "hang with them" in the tight turns!
If he's having problems with locking the rear brakes on corner entry why not invest in a brake proportioning valve? They're like $50.
Everything TheCrudMan said here is correct. Short nose crank issues should keep the 90-91 from ranking too high. The smaller brakes, 1.6L engine and VLSD should guarantee the 90-93 don't get ranked very high.
The front emblem should be a Pentastar. If you're going to get a bad tattoo it should at least not look like a Chinese knockoff.
Now playing
Mary Pozzi's 71 Camaro:
During qualifying on Saturday I was amazed by how many of these guys would exit the pits on their warm up lap and not yield to the car coming up the straight on a hot lap. Saw at least 3 of them park their car on the apex in turn 1 and ruin the other guy's lap.
I would like to know when these "old days" were.
You're missing the losses from compressing the hydrogen... and the losses from converting the hydrogen back into electricity to power the car. Due to these losses the hydrogen fuel cell will always be less efficient.
Now playing
In car view:
If Red Bull has traction control, why are Webber's starts the worst on the grid?
I wonder how many Chicago residents thought of this story when they heard it was a piece of a semi that caused this: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1994-11-09/new…
Scary part is the "faster" portion of that statement has been proven true so many times. I can have finished parts from China before our internal group even agrees to start making the tooling.
US Cellular Field in Chicago.
No, I am not pointing to Chicago as a success. I am just pointing to it as a control that shows that even without increased gun ownership murders have been cut in half.
Chicago is not the murder capital of the US despite lazy media reports. This is a good article that explains how murder rates work: http://chicago.cb…