As ignorant as she sounds, if you actually look at the website, it promotes healthy ideals. "What is a no excuse mom? She's a mom that makes no excuses for making her health a priority." Then on the website she celebrates women who've done just that, gotten healthier. And many of the women on the website aren't crazy…

It's debatable, but the college could make a defense in that area on point #4. Minimal class time is a hallmark of research universities, and a red flag to small liberal arts colleges.

Oh man, I want to be with her on this, as a person who will one day, hopefully, be on the academic market (provided I learn to rein in the procrastination), but I think she most definitely communicated her lack of fit with the college by listing these particular (and many) conditions. Negotiable starting year? Tough…

Sounds like Huckabee isn't a Milford man!

I think he killed Britney the way he did because she fought him. Then when he was left with Crystal, who witnessed him beating Britney to death, he shot her. Maybe I am not jaded enough in this instance, but I don't think Galveston is going to drop the ball on this one. That sketch is very detailed. Someone knows…

Bring on the body acceptance encouraging cancer posts!

Obviously the scientists are shills for the patriarchy, or something.

A healthy weight for one's bone structure and height would indeed correlate to a healthy body fat %.

I'm sorry but that study used science which means, as we all know here, is just fat shaming propaganda.

But can you really limit such indignant rage to just one article?

I gotta ask. Is there any cross discussion within Gawker media as to what articles get written and how many times they can be repeated within the same day? Reminds me of the senile uncle that repeats the same story several times like it's the first time.

Does no one remember the DC sniper? Tons of "thought pieces" about John Mohammed and Lee Boyd Malvo, especially on the later since he was so young, people couldn't understand why he would do such a thing. Let's compare apples to apples. Mass killings get this type of attention. I would maybe argue that the recent Navy…

The Virginia Tech shooter was Asian, and there was plenty of speculation about him and why he would do such things.

She literally handed her son, who had the debilitating and deadly mental disturbances, guns and taught him how to use them. She didn't deserve to die, and she isn't the reason that this happened, but she sure as hell had a role to play in this. It's not about who is a perfect mother or a bad one, it's about her being…

i'm a guy now too? also, reading comprehension. i said there's nothing wrong with discussing the guy's mental state and speculating as to what could have been wrong with him. also, i really don't think there's anything wrong with wondering if there really was more than 'just' asperger's wrong with the kid - in fact,…

emotional and irrational. you're really not making any sense now, and you've deviated wildly from the topic at hand.

and again, still not discussing my actual points. so much intellectual laziness. unlike you, i don't give a crap about 'winning' internet arguments. try more reason, less emotion.

personal insults... the last refuge of the out-argued.

Paranoid schizophrenia is reasonably stigmatized. Even though this was a nonprofessional, unreliable diagnosis, if the effect was to make readers believe that paranoid schizophrenics are dangerous, then the effect was to make people believe something that is true.

The mom was in denial that her son was as messed up as he was. It's the warped logic of desperation: If I remove the guns from my house that means Adam is ill. So I'll keep the guns where they are and that means he's not.