No it isn't. I have run stretched tires for years without issue.

Fix the fucking streets and it won't happen.

This is true of almost any car vs SUV collision. Doesn't really matter.

I haven't seen any. I do know that when driving a lowered car I drive SLOWER because the pavement sucks, so in many regards I'd call it safer.

Here's my car, running stretched tires and lowered 2.5". It handles great and is not unsafe:

no it isn't. I've had a few cars w stretched tires and no problems. You're clueless.

that is poor driving. Lowering it generally helps handling, and even if it didn't, so what? Are they enforcing jacked up pickup trucks? Banning Chris Chinese tires? Fining people w bald tires? How about donks? What about new tires and wheels that are heavier than stock?

funny my s6 handles eons better after lowering it, and I put in slightly stretched tires so I can run a wider width than stock without rubbing my fenders, so it has more grip than stock. How am I unsafe????

this is fucking stupid. My s6 is lowered w slightly stretched tires and handles like its on rails.

I don't think there's much better than VAG, honestly.

But that's what I'm trying to tell you: performance wise, it was not shitty. A first generation neon is both faster than, and will out slalom a new mini cooper. It was also faster than any civic sold here in the states, and most integras. The interior was bad, but great compared to the competition from the big 3.…

It depends if you also own a vagina.

If you'll allow me to don my flame-suit for a second, I'm going to express an unpopular opinion: I have seen the 2015 Ford Mustang in person a few times, and I'm not a huge fan of how it looks. Not because of the Aston Martin face, but because it's just too "soft," not angry enough.

Why is she entitled to any of his shit? He is the one that wrote the books and made the documentaries. I'm not sure why the hell society thinks it's cool to divvy up a guy's belongings when she did jack shit to produce them.

Competitive? It assraped everything japan had! That's why I respect chrysler... it isn't always a great car, but when they set their sites on something and just go for it, they result in memorable automobiles. See Daytona Charger, Superbird, SRT4, it just destroyed all competition and was kind of hated for it.

Headgaskets and neons were actually more the 1st generation neon, when they used paper headgaskets instead of MLS (multi layered steel) gaskets. This was an on the fly change that happened in mid 1997 somewhere.

You need to put things in perspective. The neon was a reasonably fun to drive, shitty econobox. Compared to GM's J bodies, it was better handling, faster, and had a better interior. Compared to Ford's horribly dated escort and lukewarm restyled ZX2, it was again, better handling, faster, and had a better interior. …

idk about SRT4s, but lots of 1st generation neons got stinky. Culprit? Taillight gasket was cheap shitty foam. It let water in the trunk, which would sit and stagnate and get mildewy. I ripped my taillights out and RTV'd both sides of the gasket, and then left my trunk open on sunny days. No more stink, ever.

Never understood the neon hate. Ever. I had a 97 SOHC coupe. Beat up tons of modified hondas, when it was basically stock, took out an automatic M3, 3000GT (non VR4), all sorts of so called nice cars. Thing was durable, I beat the shit out of it, looked decent, and was loads, LOADS better than any GM or Ford…

Ah. I don't do new cars, maybe the new ones are garbage, but honestly the newer cars are so fat I don't even care about them. Lol. Get an older one. They're better.