Yea. Its the easiest factor to point to as the argument is little more than pointing at numbers without explanation. “Look at X, if X voted for my candidate, everything would be different.” It completely ignores pesky nuance such as why the individual voted for the third party in the first place. Each election, there…

This is a half-hearted response made for the sake of argument: (1) the Green party does not actually try to win elections (2) they operate like a parasite, feeding off of disillusionment with what is going on. (3) The disillusionment is a real, legit critique of our political process (4) That feeling should be focused…

Its not surprising that he’d trash himself, after all, he’s Ben Jealous all his life...

Look at the photo on the top and compare it with July 29, 2018. Can you be certain that it is not marker?

Compare picture on the top with July 29, 2018. I do not know what you mean by the pics are flipped, but I also don’t know how two dead on photos could show “tattoo” on different cheeks.

I didn’t read the article, I just scanned the photos trying to determine if those face tattoos are fake. Pretty sure “ZZZ Lover” keeps switching cheeks.

Hahahaha. Sometimes things are things tho... :(. If you look in the grays, one of them responded with much vitriol and condemnation.

Haha, why is that? I am absolutely shocked that so many people read it. A lot more internet likes than I thought possible.

This is a good point.  I would say that you can’t prove that the deep state are not lizard people.

Haha. Its here and features me obnoxiously passing of other people’s ideas as my own through snarky comments that, other than this time, no one reads.  

Solid burn.  

Haha. You are focusing on some of the ways they apparently act outside their own interest.  The only pushback I would give you is that you are assuming your values are the same as theirs.  They might feel like they have to give certain things up because “X” thing that we view as crazy is more important. Just something…

Oh wow, its a real thing. And there is a picture of a crank! Gonna save this for a deeper dive later.

Yea, maybe.  I thought that Qanon had died down, so maybe they started posting again or something.

Loons are a noble water fowl, we don’t need to bring them into this.

Yea, I am sure there are many reasons.  I am just shooting from the hip here. 

Oh snap. 

Qanon is just a modified Pizzagate theory. Basically, these people all agreed that Pizzagate was “probably not true,” but the underlying implications of the existence of a Deep State and an alleged Clinton criminal empire were. Qanon just gave them a pivot. “Drain the Swamp” (i.e. remove the deep state from power) and…

Pretty certain there are only 3 “duns” in another bites the dust and a rest where the fourth would be.   

I am thinking somewhere around three paragraphs. 1. procedural history. 2. arguments on appeal. 3. “Appellant’s claims are entirely without merit. As we see no reason to disturb the judgment of the jury, the appeal is denied.”