123456q
Ghinne Blerb, Jr.
123456q

Oh snap. 

Qanon is just a modified Pizzagate theory. Basically, these people all agreed that Pizzagate was “probably not true,” but the underlying implications of the existence of a Deep State and an alleged Clinton criminal empire were. Qanon just gave them a pivot. “Drain the Swamp” (i.e. remove the deep state from power) and

Pretty certain there are only 3 “duns” in another bites the dust and a rest where the fourth would be.   

I am thinking somewhere around three paragraphs. 1. procedural history. 2. arguments on appeal. 3. “Appellant’s claims are entirely without merit. As we see no reason to disturb the judgment of the jury, the appeal is denied.” 

There is no point where I ever suggested that the ruling would or could be overturned. That is something you simply read into it. Different wrongful acts connote different forms of redress. The story identified certain conduct that I determined was potentially improper. My OP described that conduct and then identified

What are you talking about? I can tell you are angry, but that’s it. Of course Bar Associations can enforce their rules of professional conduct. They do so by censure, suspension and revocation of licenses to practice law within their jurisdiction. The target of said theoretical investigation would not be Janus, but

Most people understood that I was not talking about myself. You did not. For that, you win an award, but the award you won is not the type of award people typically set out to earn.

Try as I might, calling them an idiot has had very little effect at changing their mind

Cue drain the swamp chants. One of the things that is hard for us to accept is the depth by which the core Trump supporter is increasingly divorced from reality. They likely believe that all of these individuals, no matter their capacity within or adjacent to government, are actively conspiring to commit crimes

I would agree with you while phrasing it slightly different. Mostly, I object to the idea that [progressives] don’t need the center left at all.” After all, my core argument is that Centrists (to the extent there are any), Liberals and Progressives all need to join together and defeat the Conservatives. That process

I probably agree with whatever your point is, but I am going to argue with you anyways. Hillary DID campaign in PA, she just was really dumb about where she campaigned. I know because I volunteered for her there and was like “Why are we talking to these people who know more about where and when they are supposed to

Yea, not saying I know their guilt for a fact. Just that this type of situation is precisely one of the things that bar associations exist to prevent.

Gosh, you are really zinging me hard here. But, I’m confused as to where I said this would result in changing the SCOTUS ruling? Why don’t you go back to shouting at clouds, you dotish coot.

I think you are grey because what you said is abominably dumb. The entire purpose of the Bar Association is to do things like this. Practicing law is a privilege and the bar association controls these peoples’ licenses. They can investigate and discipline for failure to cooperate with any investigation. Aside, there

Right and wrong are not partisan issues, dipshit.

Gosh, he sure seems like a fine fellow.  But Senior? When you say it like that, I just don’t know! 

Hmmm, based on the number of times you said “no” and the amount of “Os” you used in “Looooong” it appears that I was wrong to make such a suggestion. I would like to formally apologize to Janus and the IPI for referencing their own actions. Just to be safe, I’ll apologize to the entire state of illinois, the baby

Generally, you can’t pay people to become plaintiffs in law suits. The Illinois bar association should investigate that as it looks a lot like a payment from here.

But is Kiara elite ?

Someone on the Papa John’s board has to be the source of all this, right? How long do you think they were planning his ouster?