The over/under on hours before Trump or a surrogate does a complete about face and declares that the Supreme Court found his “Muslim Ban” constitutional, just utterly clowning on 3 of the 5 justices who voted for it (Alito and Thomas would be fine with a Christian state and would have voted regardless) is currently…

Kryptonite bones would be fatal to a Kryptonian, e.g., Superman. Not sure what the metaphor was supposed to convey. 

As a theoretical defense of the Doncic trade (I too think it was dumb), the thing that cannot be easily quantified is how much that hate Schroder. There were grumblings that he was a bad teammate and there was off the court stuff with him for the last two years. Even when they were pushing Teague out, their were…

I think there is a real risk of that.  Hopefully, more will realize that it is poor policy to encourage law enforcement to be such a liability.  

Exactly. While a Mayonnaise festival sounds kinda lame, residents need to know that “because police officer did X, you no longer can have Y.” People need to see the societal cost of permitting police brutality.

If she is licensing the rights to dramatize her crimes, she should have money to pay restitution, which would go a long way in getting a reduced sentence. Something doesn’t add up.

This new rhetoric is especially pathetic, it seems to argue that the human rights violations not actually human rights violations because there is insufficient evidence of any harm to the children. First, this ignores the fact that the government is restricting access so we cannot investigate. Second, it is…

That fact that the only argument that seemed to make any headway was how the policy of cruel and pervasive human rights violations made Trump look poorly says everything ...

The problem with you is that you are intellectually dishonest. You think this evasive rhetoric is convincing, but it actually undermines your earlier position. If you actually believed in your earlier position, you would respond to the most damning parts of my response. You haven’t done this because you can’t, so you…

Avoiding the questions, eh? I see you are a coward. Its hard to take you seriously when you are a chicken shit troll who pretends they are a lawyer in the comment sections, but can’t even be bothered to read a wikipedia article entitled “Impeachment Process Against Richard Nixon” before spouting off. Had you…

Your pseudo-legal opinion is dumb. “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not require a violation of any criminal statute. In fact, Nixon’s alleged tax evasion was not considered a high crime or misdemeanor during his impeachment.

The policy of systemic human rights violations at our southern border is an impeachable offense in itself. There is no need for the Mueller investigation. The only thing standing in the way is the political will of the Republican Party. At best, its unclear whether they stand for anything beyond their own power right…

Even under their own ruling, there appears to be no reason why they can’t make a public transcript.

Their rhetoric is really just to create ANY reason and then stick to that reason while ignoring all other logic, argument or inquiry. If that reason does not serve a later purpose, apply a new reason and deny the earlier one. Its really just gas-lighting or for people who do not understand the reference, “lying.”

Shouting elitist shit at any Ivy League sporting event is, unfortunately, pretty commonplace. Waking up in a strange bed covered in your own piss, however, is part of the Eastern European study abroad program.

The policy of systemic human rights violations at our southern border is an impeachable offense in itself. There is no need for the Mueller investigation. The only thing standing in the way is the political will of the Republican Party. At best, its unclear whether they stand for anything beyond their own power right…

I do not know what I have not heard anyone say this, maybe my head is in the sand, but the policy of systemic human rights’ violations at our southern border is an impeachable offense in itself. We do not need the Mueller investigation anymore.

Yea, he is clearly messing with him to get a reaction and then using that reaction to continue harassing him. Its the classic “put your finger in front of someone’s face and say ‘I’m not touching you’” method of policing.

Wow. Among other things, the nonchalant manner in which the responding officers express awareness of their misconduct really exemplifies the current problem with the system. They feel empowered to break the law and see a financial incentive in doing so. These are law enforcement officers, they are supposed to enforce…

Wondering why the heading was not “Is England?” Is this to leave open the possibility for more than one team being England by the end of the tournament? Very excited to see how this story develops.