apijnvpuiapiujncpaomwvpcej12vvvf
apijnvpuiapiujncpaomwvpcej12vvvf
I think that’s “shhshsits and shshsshstares”
Because it’s a disingenuous slogan meant to silence BLM. Context Matters, too, you dumbass.
To summarize, we can’t hear or see what the terrorists are saying, and that’s the media’s fault, which we know because of what we heard the terrorists say.
You’re not good at reading.
If you click the three dots in the top right of a comments and select “go to permalink” you’ll reload to the link that brings you right to the comment.
The only problem is that, for a country like us that has our own currency, running a balanced budget isn’t smart. Right now we borrow at basically 0%. Why wouldn’t we borrow some money to stimulate the economy? Current estimates are that each dollar borrowed by the government creates two worth of GDP. There are…
Yes.
Nobody asked how far he could punt a football?
That’s so awesome. The horn even went.
I’m glad you mentioned this. I use monoprice a lot and will start doing some research.
I’m glad you mentioned this. I use monoprice a lot and will start doing some research.
See, it works. Now they have you paying attention to the commercials. I think that’s the whole plan.
Thanks for this — I’m adding it to my rotation now.
Didn’t comedy central try that with Norm MacDonald? I never even got a chance to see an episode because it was cancelled so fast. I would think something like that should be really successful too. Maybe it needs to be once a week — like Last Week Tonight.
use this link and they will come right to his comment, with the whole article above it:
Highlighting political issues, using humor, with a liberal-leaning viewpoint and a comedian host (who got the job by hosting the Daily Show). Yeah, the fact that they can make longer form bits since they don’t need commercial breaks makes it totally different. Sure.
Is your point really that the precedent exists, but only in cases with facts that are distinct from this one? That’s not precedent.
So he’s going to use a phone made in Korea and China, in order to show his support for the US?
They can get his phone records and figured out who was “telephoned” from that telephone. They can access their email without breaking the phone. They probably can get into his icloud without accessing the phone too. This is just the DOJ trying to set a bad precedent opportunistically by making it about terrorism. It’s…
They would have mentioned that in the brief.