05hartleyjack
Jaaag Hartley
05hartleyjack

It's nothing to with colonialism or imperialism, the people are British and want to remain British. We'll give up the falklands when you give up hawaii and alaska

they are allowed 100 km for promotional/filming

isn't the correct way to lower a car, without buying whole new suspension, to cut a length of the spring off? this is from a complete novice mechanic so laugh at my wrongness if you have to

trust me we will do all we can to keep them, the argentines never had them and never will

Buenos Aires? needs more people crying over the fact that the Falklands are rightfully ours!

Now playing

i don't like this advert, i don't like KIAs, but it is much better than these adverts

the car analogy is good. Safety equipment costs money, weighs a lot, takes up a lot of space. This makes the car slower that it could be, heavier than it should be, and bigger than it need be. And of you really think that they genuinely haven't tested the scanners before then you really don't think do you

You're kidding, really!? a Supercar from 1989 isn't quicker than a sports car that is nearly 15 years younger?! well slap me silly.

i'd agree with that, but what annoys me about this subject is that, I'm from England, so whilst we are at threat from terrorism via Air (the bottle bomb plot was planned to go on UK to USA flights), we were victim to horrible attacks on public transport, yet the security hasn't changed

ok then, you buy a brand new car, i mean on that has literally just been launched, like the new Ford Fusion for example. you know it has technology to save you in a crash, but it hasn't proved true yet. Does that mean it should be removed of all its safety equipment because it hasn't saved any lives yet? It can save

in what way is it degrading?! its a blurry photo. I don't know any of the statistics, i don't really care for them, statistics mean nothing a lot of the time. Statistically 1 in 3 people get cancer, yet an awful lot (seemingly more than my fair share) of people i know have either got it, had it or died from it. The

Im english so haven't had experience of the TSA, but i have seen the scanners at my airport, they really don't seem that bad, its not like they make you take your clothes off, pout and take a photo. I know we shouldn't need them, and arguably we don't, but i would rather have the precautions in place than not

not sure if sarcastic....

or just go through the fucking scanner. is it really a big deal that a guy will see a fuzzy naked picture of you? Would you rather a guy sniggering whilst he looks at a blurry photo or being blown out of the sky by a guy who read his bible wrong?

Lotus' philosophy has not been "Less is More" that is the philosophy for minimalism, Lotus are not about making the minimal car available. The philosophy is "Simplify and add lightness" It is not a hard philosophy, look at all the Lotuses that have come previously. Bahar is pissing on the legacy of Colin Chapman by

yes he was a complete twat to drive him of the track like that, but that was his paradox, he would do that but he would also run across the track to save erik comas. From a dispassionate view he did go for the gap, and he did that throughout his career, from the very start. He went for gaps, if the other guy carried

Senna was obnoxious, of course he was, but he had a right to be in a way, Prost didn't, he wasn't a good a driver as Senna. He was a great driver, and he new how to get the points, but as a driver he wasn't as good. And yes Senna was imperfect, that is shown when it talks of Monaco 1988, he went so far to crush Alain

What was different then

in the film he is the villain, along with Balestre, so from a dispassionate film view, he was an evil bastard, whereas racing fans will tell you he was simply a bit of a knob. And the thing is, they didn't reconcile until towards the end