It's nothing to with colonialism or imperialism, the people are British and want to remain British. We'll give up the falklands when you give up hawaii and alaska
It's nothing to with colonialism or imperialism, the people are British and want to remain British. We'll give up the falklands when you give up hawaii and alaska
they are allowed 100 km for promotional/filming
first thing that came into my head
isn't the correct way to lower a car, without buying whole new suspension, to cut a length of the spring off? this is from a complete novice mechanic so laugh at my wrongness if you have to
trust me we will do all we can to keep them, the argentines never had them and never will
i don't like this advert, i don't like KIAs, but it is much better than these adverts
the car analogy is good. Safety equipment costs money, weighs a lot, takes up a lot of space. This makes the car slower that it could be, heavier than it should be, and bigger than it need be. And of you really think that they genuinely haven't tested the scanners before then you really don't think do you
You're kidding, really!? a Supercar from 1989 isn't quicker than a sports car that is nearly 15 years younger?! well slap me silly.
ok then, you buy a brand new car, i mean on that has literally just been launched, like the new Ford Fusion for example. you know it has technology to save you in a crash, but it hasn't proved true yet. Does that mean it should be removed of all its safety equipment because it hasn't saved any lives yet? It can save…
in what way is it degrading?! its a blurry photo. I don't know any of the statistics, i don't really care for them, statistics mean nothing a lot of the time. Statistically 1 in 3 people get cancer, yet an awful lot (seemingly more than my fair share) of people i know have either got it, had it or died from it. The…
Im english so haven't had experience of the TSA, but i have seen the scanners at my airport, they really don't seem that bad, its not like they make you take your clothes off, pout and take a photo. I know we shouldn't need them, and arguably we don't, but i would rather have the precautions in place than not
not sure if sarcastic....
Lotus' philosophy has not been "Less is More" that is the philosophy for minimalism, Lotus are not about making the minimal car available. The philosophy is "Simplify and add lightness" It is not a hard philosophy, look at all the Lotuses that have come previously. Bahar is pissing on the legacy of Colin Chapman by…
yes he was a complete twat to drive him of the track like that, but that was his paradox, he would do that but he would also run across the track to save erik comas. From a dispassionate view he did go for the gap, and he did that throughout his career, from the very start. He went for gaps, if the other guy carried…
Senna was obnoxious, of course he was, but he had a right to be in a way, Prost didn't, he wasn't a good a driver as Senna. He was a great driver, and he new how to get the points, but as a driver he wasn't as good. And yes Senna was imperfect, that is shown when it talks of Monaco 1988, he went so far to crush Alain…
What was different then
in the film he is the villain, along with Balestre, so from a dispassionate film view, he was an evil bastard, whereas racing fans will tell you he was simply a bit of a knob. And the thing is, they didn't reconcile until towards the end