1812 called. They want their war strategy back. 

Delivered in a satchel on a pony

“They’re mostly substance abusing adrenaline junkies who can’t hold a regular job”

There has to be 200 if not 300 of these puns available.

Arizona allows on-road ATV use if you have certain equipment. My RZR is plated as a motorcycle.

You might deserve billions, but with that mentality you will never earn billions.

Nope. That’s a pig broiling in it’s own tastiness. 16-24 more hours and it’s all done.

You should run to the vehicle and smash the window to save them.

Wow. Let the hate flow through you.

Bacon to get outta that car

No you shut up. La la la la...

You are right. Read ahead and replied to earlier post.

So because they are safer, they should be banned? Interesting approach.

Shut up

I had no idea you could entertain a toddler with an old battery. I’ll have to give it a shot.

You aren’t lying, you are just wrong. You were paid (through a direct reduction of your tax burden) to make a purchase. That is a subsidy and expense (through unrealized tax income) for the government that is covered by other taxpayers.

Of course you are.

My taxes are not part of the discussion. The issue originally raised is that taxpayers are funding a subsidy to a class of people who can afford a relatively expensive 2nd (3rd, 4th...) car. Most find that to be questionable. You fail to understand the math that shows this subsidy is an expense that must be covered by…

“In addition to spending $2 billion on tax credits for consumers of electric vehicles”: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/09/21/cbo-government-will-spend-7-5-billion-on-electric-vehicles-what-are-we-getting-back/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b21eaa2f9c84