You think you're smarter than magic wish box? THAT'S WHAT MAGIC WISH BOX WANTS YOU TO THINK!!!

It's also the only show on TV currently employing a Centauri, now that Babylon 5 is no longer airing.

The guy who wrote that book periodically turns up as one of the commenters on Ancient Aliens … also on the History Channel.

Then how do you explain that the person in that photo had a hairline, and Fred Noonan ALSO had a hairline?

But then he might end up with no delta brainwave.

There is currently a Russian cosmonaut named Mikhail Kornienko. I'm not saying you're not right in general, but it's not impossible.

Yeah, I'm surprised how many reviews I've seen that complain about the MCU elements. This movie didn't feel at all like it was "just setting up Infinity War" or just extending the brand or whatever to me, any more than Star Trek movies feel like they're just setting up a Starfleet cinematic universe or the John Wick…

Man, I'm glad Toomes didn't kidnap anyone. That way pretty much every villain's go-to move in the Raimi movies - MJ literally gets taken hostage in every one! - and I was pretty sick of it. (Not to mention that it wouldn't have made any sense - he'd never heard of Peter Parker before that night and he was on far too…

For what it's worth, while I don't remember them mentioning his name onscreen, Bokeem Woodbine is credited as "Herman Schultz/Shocker #2." So if they bring the Shocker back for a Sinister Six or something, I'm thinking it's going to be less a "whoever's using the gear" thing than a "there was another guy before the…

Could be that the movie actually is set in the future (I forget if they ever mention a specific year in the movie). Maybe this movie is supposed to happen right before Infinity War or something, so their choices were either set this movie in the future or set that movie in 2017.

I've been saying for years that one of my biggest complaints with the previous Spider-Man movies (and Batman movies, and a lot of superhero movies in general) is that there are no "throwaway" villains because they're determined not to "use up" any minor villains on the off chance they might want to build a movie…

Well she's not concerned about racism enough to not blame the Native Americans for a crime she knows they didn't commit, so I think she's pretty much fine with anything she thinks she can spin to her advantage at this point.

Seriously, I don't think there are many ideologies where a bunch of people who came together because they all share that ideology won't get along.

In a better written show, that would be a clue that something was amiss at the Broken Jaw Ranch. Like it would suggest that the place was basically a cult, where the leader focused all his efforts on making newcomers want to stay to increase his flock, trusting that all the existing residents were sufficiently…

I thought Troy confirmed that he did kill the family. He told Madison that he didn't intend to kill them when he left to confront them, but things got out of control when he talked to his friend (I think 'cause the guy wouldn't look him in the eye).

I keep feeling like she's working some kind of angle - like she's try to get Troy in a position of power because she thinks she can control him like a puppet - but I wish they'd be a little more explicit about her plans. There are shows that have earned the kind of trust were characters can act nebulously and a viewer…

That shot up there is her being unable to work up the nerve to shoot a zombie (specifically a teenage girl that was her daughter's friend) so a certain lack of conviction actually makes sense.

I'd say her part in Blades of Glory was reasonably important. She was arguably the main villain. (I don't think you could make a case for Will Arnett as the main villain, but you could argue that they were of equal significance).

I don't know if I stand alone on this or not, but I liked Blades of Glory and Hamlet 2.

It's like getting beaten about the head and neck with a watermelon by Hello Kitty.