You serious?

I’m really beginning to think that Tyler should let Buzz have his own column or comment section maybe titled ‘Why I Should Be In Charge: Prepare For Nucear Armageddon’ or something else knee jerk right wing nut jobbery. Perhaps ‘Trump Supporters Sign Here?’

Only if you want another war

Right, it’s smart to shoot down drones/spy planes/satellites/ornamental kites belonging to people you’re not at war with. We need people in charge who’ll do shit like that.

Wild guess...you’re voting for Trump?

Sfferries nailed it. Part of my job is to provide security to carriers in the AG/Strait of Hormuz, and this is a total non-incident. I’ve intercepted boats armed with rockets, guns and torpedoes, helicopters, drones, all kinds of things, and honestly, this is so low on the list of scary things that can come at a…

I wouldn’t bother arguing with Buzz, he’ll be back with the exact same wrong opinion on every post. It’s not worth the effort.

Right, shoot down the drone and prompt them to respond with anti-ship missiles, of which they have both quantity and quality. This is just an Iranian way of showing off, directed towards their domestic audience.

Um... they shot down a drone (or, more likely, found one that crashed) over THEIR airspace.

This is a very flawed argument, the basis of which is “it’s worth rolling the dice on Iran’s reaction in order to make a point.” By your same logic, when two of our boats entered Iranian waters then Iran should have sank them both. “Because one of these days it will be a hostile action. And [Iran] won’t be ready for…

that would be very bad for international relations. we ARE NOW working with Iran not against them and they are not against us. get over it. and being in international waters instead of being docked in a hostile territory are quite different things.

There’s no limit to what they could’ve done. I wonder if our math is exclusively derivative of their findings or if it developed separately in multiple places. I wonder how integral this was to their agricultural practices and or if this were studied more abstractly.

Riemann sum.

You can’t blame Obama for the disasters of Bush. If you think sending even more people to Iraq/Afghanistan will change anything it won’t, enough have died. Islam is a lost cause, the wars are unwinnable matter how many troops are thrown at it

Another neo-con twit that doesn’t realise that if it wasn’t for Rumsfeld and his accomplices ISIS wouldn’t exist.

My Gramps was there on D-Day. He was 4th Infantry and landed on Utah Beach. He made it through the hedgerows, live through the Hertgen Forrest, Saw the liberation of Paris and was ultimately injured somewhere in Germany. He never spoke of anything he saw until a few years before his death at 80 years old. The one…

dumb shit ISIS won’t even exist if we didn’t invade Iraq.

I know two of those families. They remain utterly ruined, all for this man’s vainglorious hubris.

I wish your mother was in ISIS’s hands liberal fool.

So correct. They signed our friends up to die just to prove a (dumb) point and give Boeing, Lockheed and Northrop Grumman a massive R&D lab (Iraq) that us taxpayers paid for. Oh and they all owned Halliburton stock

Not to mention the possible hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi’s that were killed as a result of that bogus war. Of course their lives count for much less than that of a brave American hero.