To Pixie Solanas:  Gotta have standards.  "FANTASTIC FUNNY COOL SNAPPY MEMORABLE" isn't exactly hate speech.  But unless you're careful, tossing around the word "great" just ends up devaluing Film Language…along with the history of Comedies that actually  DESERVE the "timelessness" award (—and not just a popularity…

To Pixie Solanas:  Gotta have standards.  "FANTASTIC FUNNY COOL SNAPPY MEMORABLE" isn't exactly hate speech.  But unless you're careful, tossing around the word "great" just ends up devaluing Film Language…along with the history of Comedies that actually  DESERVE the "timelessness" award (—and not just a popularity…

Will see.

Will see.

Hey, I love "Stripes," too.  (In fact, I cut together a video called "Full Metal Stripes," showing the dozens of ways that Reitman's movie oddly intersects with and parallels Kubrick's in terms of characters, settings, conflicts, etc.)  But "Stripes," for all its humor, has far too much slack, hackery, weak writing…

Hey, I love "Stripes," too.  (In fact, I cut together a video called "Full Metal Stripes," showing the dozens of ways that Reitman's movie oddly intersects with and parallels Kubrick's in terms of characters, settings, conflicts, etc.)  But "Stripes," for all its humor, has far too much slack, hackery, weak writing…

Mac2ber?  Fuck Youber.

Mac2ber?  Fuck Youber.

Can't you fools see what's really going on here?!?  The Sherlock writers obviously lifted their entire plot  from "Adaptation" —using the central surprise gimmick of Donald Kaufman's screenplay-within-a-movie "The 3":

Can't you fools see what's really going on here?!?  The Sherlock writers obviously lifted their entire plot  from "Adaptation" —using the central surprise gimmick of Donald Kaufman's screenplay-within-a-movie "The 3":

Trix are for kid
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Trix are for kid
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Hello, again.  Although I still think you're right (given that Biochemist Logic is probably more rigorous than Television Logic) —here's why you might be wrong:

Hello, again.  Although I still think you're right (given that Biochemist Logic is probably more rigorous than Television Logic) —here's why you might be wrong:

Um…I meant:  Good show old bean.  (Unless you're young; I hope I'm not being unintentionally insulting…)

Um…I meant:  Good show old bean.  (Unless you're young; I hope I'm not being unintentionally insulting…)

I thought my read on things (in the block just below this one) was clever and correct…but your "using the body of Sherlock's murdered doppelnapper" is better.  Good show old chap!

I thought my read on things (in the block just below this one) was clever and correct…but your "using the body of Sherlock's murdered doppelnapper" is better.  Good show old chap!

I'd hazard a guess that someone else has already pointed this out, somewhere else in the quicker-fingered threads —buttfuckit:  The music Moriarty listens-to/swans-about-in-time-with/dance-performs-to in the robbery montage is Rossini's "The Thieving Magpie."

I'd hazard a guess that someone else has already pointed this out, somewhere else in the quicker-fingered threads —buttfuckit:  The music Moriarty listens-to/swans-about-in-time-with/dance-performs-to in the robbery montage is Rossini's "The Thieving Magpie."