What difference would that make?

At least you own it though. Seek help? Admitting it is a big first step to take. Be proud!

She is literally <<<< Valkyrie, who is 6'3 and muscular. Doesn't matter what her personality is like. She was cast against type, by all accounts intentionally, and from the trailer has been made to look ridiculous in the process. She deserves a better agent.

The non sequitur is a retreat from rationality.

Non sequitur rejected! I accept your retreat.

Non-sequitur rejected. I accept your retreat!

That would be an argument for you to make if you cared to support your position, yes.

There it is… rejected. I accept your withdrawal.

It is easier than responding to the actual argument.

Where is the non sequitur?

So - nowhere?

Here you go:

Non sequitur rejected. I accept your retreat!

Non sequitur rejected! I accept your retreat.

I thought so. Most people try to defend their theses.

If by 'decode the jargon' you mean ignore the stated meaning and substitute something else more ideologically compatible with your position, fine — but how could you convince anyone else to follow?

I accept your retreat on all points.

Incorrect. It means this:

So - nowhere?

Which matters only if they started watching SP in infancy, as the article suggests.