Non-sequitur rejected. I accept your retreat.

Incorrect. Your source disagrees with you. Have you actually read the page? You also need to answer to the 'per year' part.

The burden of proof is on you — it is your assertion. Proceed or retreat.

This one:

So by your own source, ~8.5 months rather than 10 months to shoot series 10 (including the xmas special), after a ~7 month break after the end of series 9?

If so, it has popped out of your strawman and not out of anything I have said. I agree that as a trend this seems like it the strawman version would occur more often than instances of that position actually ever being advanced.

Source?

Exactly right. It is hard to find a win for actual progressiveism in this at all, top to bottom.

Non-sequitur rejected. I accept your withdrawal.

Is it your assertion that there is some common morality? If so, upon what basis?

How can you show that I am angry, rather than just declare it so? If you cannot, upon what basis could you be considered rational?

How could you show that I am being pedantic instead of just declaring it so?

Non-sequitur rejected. I accept your withdrawal.

Not how that works either. It is you plugging your ears, shutting your eyes, and stamping your feet. I and all others can see you. You are not invisible.

There is no expectation of privacy on a public forum whether you care or not. Not how it works.

Makes you wonder why they just didn't perma kill the doctor and bring her back. Almost like they wanted the controversy…

Well played, sir…

Incorrect. Romana is a Time Lady. Canon.

Only if you are a sexist, misogynist red pill, MRA, white, male, subhuman. There can be no other think but the group think. Stop asking questions.

What then did you mean by 'our' logic? The royal 'our', no doubt.