Oh sure. I mean, all color of Americans benefit from the priviledge of being American and not caring about foreigners.

I’m glad he takes comfort in painting the wounded soldiers who died during his meaningless wars. If he could think about all the brown people who suffered and still suffer, it could be great. Like, a Rothko chapel full of brown faces.

And don’t ask us to reassure you about your goodness. Which I totally do with my friends of color!

By the way: I live nearby, so I’d be ok hosting people if it can help.

I mean, I understand they are right on the bottom line : Terrible economic condition give birth to “us vs them” mentality, and clearly helped every fascist regime ever to rise. But, to become that and not, say a socialist revolution, it means that people are already racist and sexist. Denying it is pointless. They are…

I don’t know. The only progressive friends I have met in my new hometown are all about Bernie, and posting things about the legitimate anger. I’m super mad at Bernie for not acknowledging the racial divide. I guess the elephant in the room is very white.

That we shouldn’t shame them for their racism and ignorance, poor cry babies?

I think her name was Poppy, not Tiffs. But on point, sir, on point!

Or the idea that no matter qualified and brave she is, a women running against a buffoon will always lose. This is a slap in the face of all women who try so much.

You can always find more brown than you to hate, or think you are “one of the good ones”.

Hey, I’m processing it through craft beers!

Thanks Julianne! I often disagree with your choices because I’m a bitch. But I’m healing, you see, and I love that and root for you ;). Seriously, I needed this.

Some of us always knew. And there is an ample body of scientific literature on how right wingers have less empathy than others which is surprising for about,... Nobody?

If it did, we wouldn’t be there...

Ok, interesting. I kind of thought that way, but as a White person, I can’t be trusted to make judgement on that.

I think your reasoning is really good. There is a vast body of literature (of the policy and scientific kind) showing that the total cost of healthcare decreases when you increase coverage and healthcare access. This stems from the fact that treating people later is more costly than if the issue was addressed earlier…

Also a: Turn over to me if it is difficult for you and it isn’t noticeable?

I don’t care. You are actively promoting ideas that are hurting the most vulnerables, and are obviously uneducated about the facts or unable to see past your point of view for the collective good.

No. It’s 8 percent or more now ( 20 million people). And among that, the reduction is bigger in the lowest bracket of income. So, unless you don’t care about the poor, this is a major thing.

And it’s actually better on a cost benefits analysis...