It sounded like you were dismissing the article in addition to dismissing the forum posts. So the baby would be the article. Apparently that was not the case /shrug

that’s the spirit. 

So making a terrible call and punishing people for speaking out against oppression is okay if you don’t actually care and are just trying to make money, gotcha.

Politically she’s the eternal victim; and it’s not hard to understand why she’ll always approach the arena in that manner.

“wait...are we the baddies?”

I have my issues with Sanders’s being an independent throughout his career instead of just being a Democrat. But your post is basically nonsense.

In the doc, you’re brutally honest on Sanders: “He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it.” That assessment still hold?

*Too many centrists blame him.

The hand-wringing over the “Never Hillary” guys is so disingenuous considering Clinton had her own group of backers (PUMA) that did the thing they’re claiming Bernie’s supporters do, but just back in ‘08. 

Cool, maybe now we can see how pointless MMO functionality is in a Pokemon game so people can finally shut up about it.

Come on Brian, there are kids that read Kotaku.

I see a few “woke” conservatives and trolls every once in awhile and I think that’s why my stance goes automatically to not trusting this individual, haha. The internet has a way of making it easier to assume they have bad intentions, rather than risk trusting them and regretting it later.

But it could still be…

I feel like anyone involved with anti-terf rhetoric or just progressive rhetoric in general would not use the word “feminazi” by any measure. It’s possible it’s just a miscommunication, but it does create immediate red flags.

That’s like black person proclaiming how much they hate race-baiting. Could be innocent, but…

That’s like you saying we should ignore what gamers do during things like AGDQ because a very, very small minority is toxic and swatters.

The old species are being added in a free update. You’ll be able to transfer them from old games or receive them in trades. The only thing you have to pay for is the areas where you can catch them.

To be fair, the 200 Pokémon will be added to the game in a free update. They won’t be catchable, but if you have Home or someone willing to trade with you you can still use them.

Weird, it’s almost like it actually takes them time to put them in. 

And articles like this help me make an informed decision about which developers I support.

Hey remember when ubisoft made this excuse about assassin's creed unity a few years ago and it was immediately proven to be bullshit?

I hope you don’t hurt yourself reaching that far.