California’s Ms. Murphy only applies to owner-occupied units (unclear here) where only one boarder is to live in the home, and explicitly requires the owner to refrain from discriminatory statements.
California’s Ms. Murphy only applies to owner-occupied units (unclear here) where only one boarder is to live in the home, and explicitly requires the owner to refrain from discriminatory statements.
Fair use is not a defense to either trademark infringement, which Duke is not alleging, or appropriation of name and likeness, which they are.
“Hard reporting”? This is a synopsis of a Tampa Bay times article.
It really doesn’t. Anywhere.
Need for Speed bombed.