No, but it's not her job to help you work out disagreements with your friends.

No, which is exactly why you should take that up with your dumb buddies.

Sounds like a problem between you and your douchebag friends, not the dancer paid to give you one.

Your math is all kinds of fucked up. You just compared the chance a cop will be involved in a fatality, to the chance a civilian will be murdered. Based on a US population of around 300,000,000, and the number of US citizens being killed by cops in 2014 (estimated by many to be around 1,000), the chance of being…

You are correct. They are electric razors.

I feel you. Just got my B+ from the kinja deal last week.

You're missing the point. Most can afford the deductible, it still sucks to be out of pocket for someone else's fuckup.

You can still turn those off. You just have to switch off the automatic lights.

You're still on the hook for the deductible.

Your understanding seems limited. Buying directly from the manufacturer, and paying MSRP are not even remotely the same thing. If there's no (pointless) dealer in the middle, there's no dealer markup. MSRP is the recommended sale price INCLUDING that dealer markup.

Seems to be what they're getting at.

Yup.

You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. Proof of infidelity can have a major effect on spousal support.

You're going to great lengths to defend a bit of laziness. It's not hard to wash and wipe down a knife after each use.

There's plenty of reasons other than the detergent to not put good knives in the dishwasher. Rust, warping, and them banging around with the other silverware, to name just a few.

Phuc Kieu? No buddy, fuck you.

My god you're an insufferable cunt. There is literally no one but you arguing your point. The article mentions the shirts being banned multiple times, as does every other article mentioning the situation, including the AP post you referenced. My only embarrassment is in entertaining the idea that you are capable of…

It wasn't the players that were banned, it was the shirts. I don't know how the article can make it any more clear for you than by putting it in the title. All you're doing is digging yourself a larger hole at this point.

You're arguing semantics, and poorly. If the replacement girls team wanted to wear the shirts, they would be allowed. Therefore, ban lifted.

I've done better: