Path of dead? This isn’t even on the radar! If they were doing this the ACLU would be under constant fire for allowing this, politicians would be losing jobs! And I just posted the actual definition of it, and everything that happened last weekend: violence by two groups, total lack of preparation or police…

So then you support violence as long as it’s against a group who’s views you don’t agree with? Why not just move to N. Korea and be done with it. Good to know I can coldcock you if I don’t like your “words”.

Dude pay attention, there was TONS of video showing antifa idiots macing people that were yelling at them, in no way does that legally warrant it. By your reasoning, every argument you have with someone freely allows you to mase them, regardless of age or gender.

Cool, so 2 people out of millions. Let me know when I should head to my bunker when they have yet another rally where they are vastly outnumbered. Which stadium will they be selling out this weekend, clownshoe?

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

I’m “only” half-white, so take what I say as half-privilege or something. But while I don’t think we should ignore these Nazis, I also think we’re sort of giving them what they want. They want a fight. They want to be seen as dangerous. And, quite frankly, that in and of itself attracts a certain kind of disillusioned…

Do you trust the current government to accurately determine what constitutes hate speech? If not, the slippery slope argument is completely valid.

Also as a white guy: doesn’t matter. The Constitution is there to protect the unpopular. That is its purpose. To protect from power.

If you’re white in America, everything is considered white privilege by someone—just like how there’s nothing Fey could have said that wouldn’t have offended some non-white.

I oppose antifa who are literally 6 times larger yet loosely organized...but also armed and dangerous and yet they get overwhelming support in the US by a wide margin.

The Paradox of Tolerance is bullshit and it is also anathema to the Constitution. Also, it follows the same slippery slope issues as people who want to outlaw hate speech. For instance, according to, Muslims in UK believe homosexuality should be illegal. Are you saying England should round up and arrest them?

It’s not white privilege. Up until yesterday, the ACLU fought for them to be allowed to speak, not because they were flexing their white privilege, but because it’s the law.

YOU accused me of defending them. I’m asking YOU what you are basing that accusation on. I have said directly (now twice) that I am not defending them, and there’s no way to defend them, but you have chosen to continue with the accusation while refusing to provide anything to back that up.

Solid logical fallacy there. You make an accusation, and instead of backing it up ask me to prove a negative. I have at no point in this defended anyone. There’s not really a party involved that I think deserves a defense, whether that be the white supremacists, Antifa, Trump, or Michael Bennett.

No, this is the problem. A lack of rational discourse to discuss actual problems. Playing the blame game against anyone who wants to actually talk about something without using any actual facts or explanation. There’s a big desire to bring out the pitchforks, but no desire to discuss reality and come up with plausible…

So 1/3rd of Latino voters? 54% of college educated voters, 11% of black voters, 52% of union workers, 25% of Obama voters and your conclusion is they all must be racist?

There are murders all across the country (and world) every day. People are evil. This is a fact of life and always will be. What is the purpose in boycotting the national anthem for this particular murder?

You are creating a boogyman. You cannot politically defeat an opponent when you don’t understand who the opponent is. Hint: it’s not these guys.

It’s a lunatic fringe. A remarkably small group that 99.9%+ of Americans, regardless of political lean, would condemn. There will always be groups like them. The primary change is not who is president. It’s the media coverage that acts like this tiny group represents an entire political group in an effort to continue…

first amemendment protects kap from not being persecuted from the government, it does not protect him from teams not wating to touch his average arm carrying all that baggage