One key problem I see, is the really steep power curve of enemies (especially in groups) and the disconnect in power curve for the player VS their pals.

I'm level 30, and while I've made two primitive guns and unlocked the handgun, I still use an upgraded Crossbow. The resources needed to make guns and ammo are to big a pain to harvest, while there are ways to get arrows for free (and they are cheap anyway). 

Works exactly the same way. Unsurprisingly, Google still tracks you in Firefox too. Almost as if thd way the browser functions and how adsense functions are unrelated things... 

Well they own YouTube, so... 

Correct. This whole argument stems from users being incredibly dense. I never once would have thought that Chrome’s Incognito would stop Google Adsense or any other site from doing its thing.

I think “it depends” is the only answer to the general question. One needs to take a really close analysis of each entry in a franchise to construct an optimal order. Usually, the order of release is going to be pretty safe, but not always. The “Machete Order” for Star Wars is an excellent example of an order that…

I know, I’m being somewhat facetious. Mainly, it seems like this game is going to be technically superior to mainline Pokémon games which is just... hilarious and depressing. Also, Nintendo and by extension Game Freak have a tendency to just ignore their massive fanbase of now-adult gamers and they just make games…

This will either be the game Pokémon fans deserve and Game Freak will never deliver... Or it will be a trash fire.

Given how thick the bezels used to be, I’m pretty sure the 18" might actually have a smaller chassis than the 17" had. And 16" is basically just 15.6" rounded up, also with thinner bezels. It’s probably almost as small as a 14" used to be.

In the immediate sense? Not a lot. This is important in a legal sense, but for most users I doubt there will be a realistic or meaningful difference from this case alone. 

How exactly does that excuse the tone of the article? As a long time Android writer and presumably user, I wouldn’t think you would be quite so enamored by Google at this point. 

Right? There are some questionable parts of the specifics in this ruling, but over all it's a win. The article acts like this is the end of the world. 

No, that would be the standard cut for selling the app itself. But it’s insane for that to cover ongoing services that Google has nothing to do with. That’s like me buying a streaming box at Best Buy, then them claiming a third of my subscription to Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, etc. They deserve a cut of selling the box,…

Windows is the most popular OS out there, and has always allowed third party applications. Does this make malware more common? Yes. Are iOS and Android devices malware free? Nope.

I see we’ve got a fanboy in the building. No credible security expert would actually recommend one OS over the other. Certain brands sure, and obviously best practices in terms of security features to utilize. But the idea that Apple devices are inherently more secure is a myth as old as Mac. It simply never was and…

I mean, if it’s their own titles being sold on their own store that’s not a monopoly. Shitty? Maybe. But it can’t be a monopoly because it’s their own product. 

They both are, but the two cases were not tried as one. So due to how the actual case played out, Apple won theirs and Google did not. Just goes to show that the system has some... bugs in it.

Yeah, I haven't really used mine for anything yet. But I saw the writing on the wall with all the press it got, and didn't want to miss the boat. 

I meant “in a fight” but also yeah, still not that useful over all. Sure, rogues are good at certain things but you don’t have to be a Rogue to pick locks and steal stuff. My second playthrough has been a Bard, which can be very nearly as good a Rogue as a Rogue can.

Haha, I telekinesised a different boss (the murderous one) into a pit. I wasn’t sure if I was SOL for doing it, so I reloaded my save just in case and dealt with her the hard way.