Why wouldn't a crossguard add funcitionality?
It's one of the most important features of a sword in general.
Why wouldn't a crossguard add funcitionality?
It's one of the most important features of a sword in general.
We're already getting there.
Good thing they've already showed the new R2D2. Which is identical to the old one. Yay!
What, not even his one-handed version?
DAMNIT, forgot to post. Reeewriting.
Not even sure if they do exist, seeing as books/comics are no longer canon.
Wouldn't be too far-fetched. I mean, Vader did stop blaster fire with his hand.
Not the same thing, but it's a step in the right direction.
It sort of makes sense, too.
I reckon it'd be hard to make the…
I actually don't know if it DOES exist, seeing as books/comics are no longer canon.
Can't be that far-fetched, though. I mean, Vader could stop blaster fire with his hand (not the same thing, I know, but it's a step in the right direction).
It kinda makes sense, too.
I reckon it'd be pretty hard to make the light just…
UNLESS!
Oops. You're right.
YES!
Finally a lightsabre with a goddamn crossguard!
No more need to excessively worry about your fingers.
"If they just use it as a guard then it would be pretty dumb"
lolwat
That's, like, the best use of a guard.
wat
Excessive, badly designed QTEs have always been hated.
The opposite, not so much.
You could also, y'know, follow the speed limits. And general laws of society.
"I've only one thing to say about this change... ABOUT FUCKING TIME!!!"
*addition
So, by your logic you're a misandrist.
And if you don't think that one of those people can get you fired because you disagree with them is a scary influence, well.. it's really a shame.
It's a new day and I don't really have the interest or energy to keep this going.
Thanks for the argument. Good day.